But the problem is whether or not the funding form those increased taxes will make a measurable effect in preventing gun violence. I’m pretty sure the answer is no.

To fund change, instead of soaking the fabulously wealthy, who largely have no need for firearms due to how insulated their lives are from danger, we put the burden on the poor to… help the poor…

I think in the bible it goes something like the rainbow was his promise of never flooding the world again.

I’ve never seen tankies and libs ever so united in celebration.

We talk about being able to stop paying things as a service in it’s own right lol.

There’s this whole anthropological theory that people’s from regions that have less resources resort to pillaging as means to survive; after many generations they become so good at it that they just simply continued to do it.

On the flip side, you have countries that have it all, in particular Asian and American countries, that never developed such a need because resources were abundant.

Actual defunct process

Actual defunct process