• Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Check this out: https://raygen.com/projects/raygen-power-plant#resources

    Batteries were a stopgap until we worked out something better. This plant gets 70% efficiency and more than enough energy storage by refrigerating a cold block, then using stored waste heat + the cold block to create a temperature differential, creating steam (in a closed loop, don’t need a big water supply) to spin a turbine that generates power when the sun goes down. Absolutely genius, already deployed and operating and yet nobody is talking about it.

      • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Efficiency. You’re collecting 70% (potentially 80%) of the available energy. The best PV is below 30% and the best molten salts are 35% max.

        • palitu@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I could not see where the 70% comes from, apart from the round trip efficiency of the heat capture. I dont know if that is what you are referring to. Do they have a input v output energy comparison somewhere?

        • IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought molten salt storage gets like 90% efficiency. What’s the advantage of storing energy by cooling blocks?

    • palitu@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i haven’t read about your link yet, but as for storage, the study states

      82% of demand was directly powered by wind and solar without having to pass through storage or be curtailed

      so the majority of the energy is used without being stored, and having the round trip losses.

      … now back to reading ray-gen