When bad management meets bad software, even great hardware is useless

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    To be honest, Windows Phone OS was a marvel in terms of user experience and design language. It was a fresh breath on interacting and utilizing the new always online world.

    Calling it ‘Bad Software’ is not fair at all.

    Too bad MS picked every possible bad decision to cripple it, starting with not putting it’s weight behind the OS at all.

    I really, really miss the feeling of being in control of my whole digital existence with just a single glance.

    • Zoldyck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exacty. The Lumia 925 was so fucking good, and streets ahead of competitors, especially for the price. The camera on that phone made pics that is still better than some phone cameras today, from models that cost double or more!

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was always in the Android camp because it was more FOSS then, more AOSP. Being said that, another competitor was and is desperately needed. When Windows Phones were in the wild, I had hope. But take a look at Windows 11, if Windows Phone had been a success, by now it would be utter shit.

      • mindlight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’d argue that Windows 11 is a result of what Google has been getting away with Android.

        Google has shown Microsoft that the users happily pay money for giving up the control of their device. While Android was open 10 years ago, Google has worked hard to lock it down for 99% of the end users. The amount of personal data they get from each device is staggering.

        • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          They all find their way to shit when profit, not user satisfaction, is the ultimate goal. In the end, we are talking Microsoft here, we already know them.

          • mindlight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, at least when you used to buy windows you were the user and the customer.

            With Google you’re just the product.

      • pycorax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        When they compromised on their UI design to make it more like Android and iOS in WP10, it was already over. It was also such a buggy mess compared to WP8.1.

        What a shame.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It was a better UI and user experience then Android by the time it launched…but by the time it launched the smartphone market had already exploded and the app developer marketplace had already matured into a profitable sector. There was no incentive to attract enough developers to build out a similar ecosystem on the late to the party Windows Phone

      • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, I agree.

        The main incentive twirled around UWP mentality, “Write one app that works on Windows, WP and Xbox automagically”.

        I think it was a fucking-a-star idea that could gather fresh developers to a big potential userbase. And surprisingly, it worked for a time as well.

        But MS again cold-feeted the platform themselves in a short span and scared everyone.

        I actually witnessed many brilliant developers wrote their very first C# code with UWP, only to spin out to other platforms later as WinPhone’s apparent neglect. PocketCasts and Flipboard are two that went very successful on other platforms.

        • mihies@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not to mention that MS completely changed their development tools and libraries more than once if I remember properly.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been running Launcher 10 on Android for a long while now. Replicates the tile interface and app list/drawer. I think it has ads with an IAP to disable them and another IAP for Live Tiles support.

      • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah, visually there are alternatives on Android, but there were a few features built into WP that Android doesn’t fundamentally support that made the whole difference.

        Like having your SO’s all accounts merged under a single node, and seeing everything related to her, be it from WhatsApp, Mail, SMS, Photo Shares etc inside a single tile was awesome. Can Android do that in 2024?

        • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          HTC had Blinkfeed for a while which was kind of similar to People Hub. It probably wouldn’t even be feasible these days as so many services have put their APIs behind paywalls.

      • Bebo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Not to mention google and apple deliberately C&Ding stuff like the awesome first party youtube apps and stuff like project islandwood. They deliberately tried to stop their apps from working because they knew what would happen if WP succeeded.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s just nostalgia speaking. It was closed source OS that objectively sucked and had zero app support.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      t was over simplified and limited creating massive wasted realestate.

      If it wasn’t for the mole they could have gone droid a whole lot earlier and i suspect, flourished as a result.

      Such a waste.