• The US has purchased 81 Soviet-era combat aircraft from Kazakhstan, the Kyiv Post reports.
  • Kazakhstan, a historic ally of Russia, is engaging more with Western nations.
  • The planes could be used for spare parts or deployed as decoys in conflict regions, the Post said.

The US has acquired 81 obsolete Soviet-era combat aircraft from Kazakhstan, the Kyiv Post reported.

Kazakhstan, which is upgrading its air fleet, auctioned off 117 Soviet-era fighter and bomber aircraft, including MiG-31 interceptors, MiG-27 fighter bombers, MiG-29 fighters, and Su-24 bombers from the 1970s and 1980s.

The declared sale value was one billion Kazakhstani tenge, said the Post, or $2.26 million, equalling an average value for each plane of $19,300.

The US purchased 81 of the aged, unusable warplanes, said the Ukrainian Telegram channel Insider UA, per the Post.

The motive behind the US purchase remains undisclosed, said the Post, but it raised the possibility of their use in Ukraine, where similar aircraft are in service.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 个月前

    NCD in shambles over the fact that they missed out on getting combat aircraft for the price of a cheap car.

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      7 个月前

      I’m actually pretty upset.

      I assume this was a bulk discount, but still. If they’d asked I bet there could have been a hell of a GoFundMe.

      • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 个月前

        I’d join a time share for that and could maybe turn a profit flying it at airshows (edit: scratch that)

        But Ukraine deserves it more

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 个月前

          You’d go bankrupt in maintenance costs and upkeep within the first month. You’d be looking at about $9,000 per hour of flight time in maintenance and component costs, and about $7,500 in fuel costs (JP-8).

          The are going to strip these for spare parts. I guarantee it.

          • Amanduh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 个月前

            I was thinking more of like putting it on my land to look at not fly

              • Amanduh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 个月前

                Well 20k isn’t a lot for some people lol, or could take a loan and pay it off. Like someone else said it’s basically the price of a car

        • CptEnder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 个月前

          Look, we just want it for reasons ok? What do you mean “stop measuring our front yard for a Su-27”, “You’ll be on a watch list”?

          Yeahhhhh ok Ukraine does need them more kicks rocks

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 个月前

        Non-Credible Defense, a shitposting community about international military affairs. The running joke is how everyone there is desperately horny for literal jets. Like, dress the jet up in a bridal gown and go to town on the thrusters level horny.

        • copd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 个月前

          Thier admins ban you for disagreeing with them. It’s a garbage community

            • copd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 个月前

              Hate satire? Absurd proposition. Their main moderator nuke banned about 10 people on a thread I was contributing because apparently everyone was fear mongering as they disagreed when he said Russia has no operational nukes 🤷

              He had a lot of downvotes and must have got upset so he permanently banned a solid 10+ people.

              Getting emotional over downvotes is a meme at this point

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 个月前

      Hell, you can’t even get a Cessna 172 that’s as old as these planes for $20k. Add another zero to the end and people will start talking.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 个月前

      Even if the thing doesn’t get airborne anymore, it’d be one hell of a way to build up a flight simulator for gaming. Probably not what’s going on here but it’s what I’d do.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 个月前

        Other than demanding a trans-pride NATO catgirl sticker on the instrument panel, I’m sure they’d love that too.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 个月前

      my first reaction to the headline lmao

      the catch is that these things won’t fly, so these are useful only as spare part donors