• Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a pretty firm believer that Loab is a hoax “cryptid” due the unwillingness of the author to publish anything on the generation parameters. I think the author got one weird result from putting “Loab” in the negative prompt and then used img2img from there. Anyone who shows images of a “cryptid” they discovered but refuses to show proofs is untrustworthy in my opinion.

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm, seems like that’s everyone claiming to have found a cryptid.

      Weird.

      • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yeah, by definition. If they share proof, it ceases to be a cryptid and simply becomes a discovery.