• JaymesRS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ve read it and all of the examples are misleading at best. These are all thoroughly flawed and it’s been covered by many others.

    Mueller didn’t say there was no collusion, it said that they found some coordination, collusion itself isn’t a legal term and the DOJ can’t prosecute a sitting president.

    The Hunter Biden laptop is a different beast than the contents there of. Even if you prove the device is his and some of the data is his, because of the poor forensic practices in handling it you have to prove that any incriminating data is also his and that’s not been done yet.

    You don’t have to give time to every theory, especially ones that are still waiting on actual validation. Just because his political pet theory wasn’t covered with the same vigor when it’s considered less likely by general consensus of experts, doesn’t mean it was suppressed.