• Klear@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve started to think about it as the second US civil war, the first being the war of independence.

    That’s just me being a smartass though.

    • w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technically true. The War of Independence WAS a civil war. It was a British civil war.

      Goes to show that the victors write the history book.

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Both the War of Independence and Revolutionary War imply that it’s a civil war.

        • w2tpmf@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s what meant. A civil war is only called a civil war if the rebelling side loses. Otherwise it’s a revolution.

          • DragonTypeWyvern
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Eh, most governments at least have the balls to call them revolts or rebellions if they win, instead of sucking up to pure evil.

    • Letme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It was also about slavery, because the British government was in the process of outlawing slavery at the time, and Americans still wanted their slaves