- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- news@lemmy.world
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- news@lemmy.world
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka’s U.S. policy fellow, said: “This is among the worst footage I’ve seen. Not only were these boys clearly unarmed and present no threat whatsoever, but they were struck multiple times even after stumbling/crawling away. There is no way they could have been considered combatants. This is unreal.”
Assal Rad, an author with a Ph.D. in Middle East history, said: “Have we ever seen so many war crimes take place right before our eyes? Any country still providing weapons and aid to Israel is complicit in these crimes.”
[Warning: the article contains a footage whose content may distress users.]
This is a video shot from far away with no confirmable context. It’s probably best to wait a few days to see what actually happened.
I mean it’s the drone that shot him. There’s not much room for doubt here.
I’m not doubting the person was shot by a drone I’m doubting the situation around why they were shot with a drone and I’d like it to be confirmed that they were actually unarmed before I add it to the list.
Do they look armed to you?
Whether they are armed or not is less important than whether they were legitimate Hamas-related targets. This footage has no context in that regard.
Drone strikes are expensive, why not reserve them for gatherings of dozens of Gazans? Why take out small groups like this? Why release the video?
Typically, the fellows pulling the trigger are so far removed from the costs it ceases to be a factor.
There is no way I could tell from that far away with that clothing type.
If you have ever seen a video of Hamas they sprint between empty buildings.
They certainly don’t walk completely out in the open like this without worries.
Haha ok I guess I haven’t watched enough hamas footage to identify them by gait.
IDF justification:
Wow what a disgusting “justification” from the idf.
Unfortunately, they sleep very well at night.
Are there different definitions of “imminent danger” or something
Palestinians present = imminent danger
Is this real? It sounds like satire, but I just can’t tell any more.
Source?