• 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s not a new law, it’s in the constitution. He cannot hold office, and there’s no need for a conviction. He participated.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      You are absolutely correct. However, we cannot trust republicans to not abuse precedent where one exists.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      They didn’t say that it’s not in the Constitution they said the states can’t enforce it.

      If we want to enforce it as a country it should come from Congress. If you give the states leeway to take people off the ballot, States can do stupid things I agree he deserves to be off the ballot but I do not love giving swing states that tool.

      • mPony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        it should come from Congress

        It seems people might not believe that Congress would abide by the constitution, seeing as last time around a whole bunch of them straight-up voted to not abide by the election results.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        States can enforce the constitutional age limit, it’s incoherent garbage nonsense to pretend states can not enforce the constitutional treason restriction