• HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve heard it’s a “pets vs cattle” thing. When you have a small fleet of distinct servers, you name them. When you have a thousand interchangeable boxes, you give them systematic IDs.

    Or you scale up to a franchise with a large enough cast. I wonder if anyone uses One Piece character names for servers?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      It kind of also depends on how you interact with them- some clusters are interacted with by admin as a single entity; those got names even if they technically represented lots of rackspace; or the hardware that’s running specific groupings of services.

      Like a databases. (Darth Vader was reserved for databases that logged and tracked errors… aka other systems that were, uh, rebellions.)

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        You give systematic id’s to completely interchangable things. You give unique names to unique things.

        If you name a formal thing (like a physical computer) by its function you have failed at naming. And are probably a manager who doesn’t see that one day you’ll need many things of almost the same function and to tell them apart. Or that one thing will have many functions.