• DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a common argument, but with 93% of people not really using cash would anyone be bothered surveilling the other 7% ?

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should be. There are many reasons you may not want a transaction to be public knowledge, or even known by governmental bodies. Apart from the actual illegal/grey area stuff, there are things that can be deemed “suspicious” which are actually completely harmless.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know that. I’m saying I don’t see the point in capturing that last few percent.

        Anyone with nefarious intent will use crypto anyway.

        • Dalinar@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Guy doesn’t want the government to know about his brothel visits.