• discusseded@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was just thinking about this and how weird and fucked up it is. Imagine a country where 13% of schools were owned and operated by the Flat Earth Society, and nobody questions it.

    Unless they have Jesus there healing the sick just what the hell is the big idea? There must be some reason or history to it. Maybe they built hospitals where none were for the community?

    • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Originally, hospitals were pilgrim’s hostels (“domus hospitalis” literally means “guest house”), and extended there service to ill, disabled, old and poor people over the time. All hospital foundations in Europe and America prior to the 19^th century and most prior to the 20^th were founded by organisations with a Christian background, aka Catholic orders, Protestant churches and charities.

      There are/were quite a few Catholic orders entirely devoted to hospital work. The address “Sister” for a nurse is a relict from the time when all hospital nurses were nuns.

      The idea, that the secular state could be responsible for the health of it’s citizen and invest into hospital building is quite recent.

      • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, it’s not bad if the church actually cares about the old and sick. Where it gets bad if they deny help for not being religious or if they interfere with the doctors. Christianity in its core values is good, but the church often forgets these.

        • taladar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Christianity in its core values is good

          It really isn’t. It just has some values that people who like to see it as good pick to describe as core values but other people pick very hateful ones as its core values from the actual pool of very mixed values it contains.

          • optissima@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The good is significantly more explicit than the hateful ones, and come later in the text, when the main character arrives.

            • DigiDemiFiend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              What are you talking about? There’s plenty of hate throughout. And quite explicit. Unless you’re referring just to the New Testament, and even then I’m not sure that’s accurate.

              • optissima@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Damn you’re criticizing it without reading it? Come on. I was an autistic 12yo, so I read it cover to cover 3 times (once to get the just, once to read it thoroughly, and once because after I finished the second run that none of the hate I was taught was actually sanctioned by the deity in human guise. At the core of the quotes from Jesus, he is calling for positivity, sharing and kindness.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There must be some reason or history to it.

      Inherently ultra-authoritarian organization wants an effective way to brainwash and threaten children into joining their cult forever. Government officials ignore constitution as well as all common sense and decency to let them.

      That’s the reason and the history in full.

      Edit: oops, that’s the reason for catholic SCHOOLS! My bad.

      The reason for catholic hospitals is that a super-rich multinational corporation talked government officials into letting them get free branding.