• Calyhre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can even see the decline in posts and votes before GPT became mainstream. This definitely look more like search engine failing to get rid of those cheap copycats.

    • zatanas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. For me, making it so that the search engine ignores -string was one of the biggest set backs.

      • REdOG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the search engine ignores -string

        WHAT? Why would they do that? WTF no wonder…

        • gosling@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hyphen (-) means you don’t want to see this word, while words surrounded by quotes (") means you want these phrases exactly.

          Most symbols are also ignored, which is great for an average user but terrible for programmers.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        On Google and on Duck Duck Go too. On DDG you can’t get rid of the over-optimized websites anymore even if you use -“website name”. Luckily -site:address still works.

        • cschreib@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s crazy. Google/DDG bloat from SEO websites had already driven me out a while ago, so I hadn’t noticed. I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now, and I find I can trust my search results again. Being able to permanently downgrade or even block a given website is an awesome feature, I would recommend it just for that.

          • supercheesecake@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hmm, not really used to the idea of paying for search, but I understand.

            Is it good at filtering AI generated sites and sites that are clearly copy pasted. Or do you kind of have to identify that yourself and manually block?

            • cschreib@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s no specific AI detection at the moment, as far as I can tell. But it has “listicle” detection. If you ask “best lawn mower”, all these “the 5 best lawn mowers of 2023” websites with affiliated Amazon links get pooled into a compact Listicle section, that you can just scroll past and ignore.

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it’s worth testing it with the free 100 searches. All you need is an email address (no credit card unless you’re actually subscribing). I’ve only been using it a few days but I don’t think it filters out AI generated sites. But you can set a ranking by site (block, lower, normal, raise, pin) so you can make stack overflow be priorised and block quora.

              They have a ranking board of top sites in each category so you can go through it and set the rank of a bunch of sites upfront.