• NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’ll note I did not dispute your “drunk people, not just drunk women” statement as I do agree with that (I even said as much above).

    What I take immense issue with is you deciding that suddenly drunk people CAN consent so long as both parties take a few shots. Which is horrifying. And now you are using drunk driving as a way to further justify what I am increasingly certain are some REALLY fucked up things you have done.

    Jesus fucking christ. Get help before you hurt more people.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You haven’t realized that you’re talking to different people, and now you’re accusing all of them of having done horrible things because they recognize that there are degrees of competency when drinking. The law says you’re legally drunk at 0.08 ABL, yet there are millions of people who can function just fine at that level. Sure, their reactions are probably slow for the purpose of driving, yet they can still perform advanced mental functions such as debate, mathematics, artistic creation, or programming. Why is sex the magic thing they absolutely cannot do in your eyes?

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You’ll note I did not dispute your “drunk people, not just drunk women” statement as I do agree with that (I even said as much above).

      I’m not the same person. Perhaps you’re too drunk to consent to this conversation?

      What I take immense issue with is you deciding that suddenly drunk people CAN consent so long as both parties take a few shots.

      What you take issue is immaterial. Is it true, or not? Mutual rape doesnt make sense as a concept . Also, what defines “drunk”? A blackout drunk person obviously can’t consent to anything but then two blackout drunk people physically can’t have sex so that’s not really in the grey area at all. And yet surely one sip of beer doesn’t do it. Are you even going to address the very basic conversation of what constitutes drunk in terms of being able to consent to sex? Or is that another question to be glossed over?

      Which is horrifying.

      Why? Explain why. Why are you horrified that two consenting adults can go to a bar, have a few shots, then have sex? This happens millions of times every day - are you just always horrified? Who are you to tell those consenting adults that they actually didn’t give consent and were raped?

      And now you are using drunk driving as a way to further justify what I am increasingly certain are some REALLY fucked up things you have done.

      You’re certain of nothing. You’re an unserious person who craves moral highground even if it’s imagined.

      Jesus fucking christ. Get help before you hurt more people.

      Lol

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        And yet surely one sip of beer doesn’t do it.

        To throw some more mud into the mix, there are trace amounts of alcohol in ordinary shit like orange juice.

    • detectivesniffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      replies to two separate people thinking they’re the same person > makes an unhinged claim that both these people (that you still think is one person) must be evil people > tells them to get help

      don’t change lemmy