The Hawaii Supreme Court handed down a unanimous opinion on Wednesday declaring that its state constitution grants individuals absolutely no right to keep and bear arms outside the context of military service. Its decision rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment, refusing to interpolate SCOTUS’ shoddy historical analysis into Hawaii law. Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discussed the ruling on this week’s Slate Plus segment of Amicus; their conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well not quite. Well regulated did also include training and they did not consider the average person to be well trained enough to qualify for the phrase.

    • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      False, George Mason quote “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials.” George Mason wrote a draft of what became the second amendment

      • nxdefiant@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yeah, a militia is a bunch of armed people with a goal.

        A well regulated one knows how to use those weapons effectively, and as a group. In my opinion the law as it stands falls short of the mandate: The US should provide public weapons training and make sure its citizens know what the hell they’re doing. That might actually save a few lives that are currently lost to accidents.

        • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have the man who wrote those words expanding upon them to say what he meant, and you’re still saying “actually he meant something else.”