Influencers are disgusted with Amazon’s paltry $25-per-video endorsement offer | It looks like full-time Amazon UCG creators are getting a 90-percent cut in pay::undefined

  • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A full time job that paid $12500 without benefits for roughly 5.5 months of work if they release 3 videos a day, 7 days a week with sponsored content. No one should take that.

    Edit: fixed missing 0.

    • Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      3 videos a day for 5.5 months (about 167 days). That’s 500 videos. 500 x $25 = $12500, not $1250.

      I have no clue if it’s feasible to make three videos a day for 5.5 months, but I guess if the length of the video doesn’t matter then It must be doable.

      It could be worth it if they can also make money through other companies for the same videos. Plus if they’re popular enough that Amazon is paying them then they must already be making ad revenue or something.

      I don’t know. I’m not a pro, just spitballing.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        People don’t tend to work weekends. So, 5 days a week, not 7 days a week. These are sponsored videos, so they are not making money through other companies.

        Do the weirdo simp for Amazon all you want, the maths don’t add up in your favour. It’s still crap.

        • Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I said I’m no pro and just spitballing, your last line about being a simp is pretty strange.

      • June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Regardless. That’s less than 25k/year for full time work. And no, 3 videos a day is really not feasible. Those things take serious to put together if you want anything with any quality whatsoever.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          US federal minimum wage is still $7.25 and if that’s worked for 40 hours a week for a year, that’s 15,080. Those people working minimum wage tend to do much more important work than shilling some stupid product online.

        • Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is the article mentioned the criteria for a video? I don’t care enough about it to read the article. Can the video be like one of those YouTube shorts and and still be worth the 25 bucks?

      • Neve8028@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no clue if it’s feasible to make three videos a day for 5.5 months, but I guess if the length of the video doesn’t matter then It must be doable.

        It’s definitely a feat to do that. Some youtube channels are able to do it but they’re working with a team of people generally. With the amount that Amazon is offering, it’s not going to be viable to hire people to help and doing it on your own is an enormous amount of work. Even for short form content.