• nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    If Sweden had found Russia at fault, you’d think they would be shouting it from the rooftops.

  • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The question of jurisdiction was more complicated than where the crime had been committed.

    So… The US did it.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ukraine actually did it, but there’s no chance they’d do that without the US giving the go-ahead.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        From what I have heard it is actually really hard to do, and only a few countries have the capabilities and equipment.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The war hawks answer would be so that we can economically separate russia-germany so that germany is more willing to go against russia. If Germany is dependent on gas from Russia they are less willing to risk their relationship.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        At the time, Germany was on the fence about sanctions because they were getting gas via the Nordstream from Russia and didn’t want to endanger that. Sudden, completely unexpected lack of gas from Russia = no impediment to backing sanctions. And that’s how it turned out.

  • arymandias@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah let’s not reflect or even think about the fact that Germanys economy has possibly been torpedoed with the go-ahead from, or directly by, its biggest ally.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why is is so hard to believe that the US blew up the pipeline? They have the capability, the motivation, and they will face absolutely no consequences from doing it. Like how is this even a question?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man I almost want to go back to reddit and smack every stupid user who exclaimed it was Russia the moment it happened with insane levels of an alibi.

    “uM AKshUlLy, THeY blEw iT uP So tHeRd be OnLy oNe PiPElInE fOr eURoPe”

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    It was a Ukrainian mission directed by the USA. Before you downvote do even a basic amount of research. There was a great finding recently that tracked down the who and the how. A chartered yacht with 6 Ukrainian special forces planted the charges and it’s not an unknown anymore. They used fake passports, left out of Rostock Germany, and Germany traced it. They found the people via camera and entry. They found the yacht itself still with explosive residue on it.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/06/nord-stream-pipeline-explosion-ukraine-russia/

    https://apnews.com/article/nord-stream-pipeline-attack-russia-investigation-4b7cb8117f420985b0d887117eebd786

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After investigators delved into a series of undersea explosions that blew apart the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines linking Russia to Western Europe in fall 2022, intelligence agencies came to a general agreement: The evidence pointed toward pro-Ukraine forces, even if the question of who might have been directing them remained a mystery.

    It even refused to team up with its closest neighbors, Denmark and Germany, a sign of how nervous the issue was making officials in Stockholm at a moment when it is still maneuvering for acceptance into the NATO military alliance.

    In an email Wednesday, Mr. Ljungquvist, the national security prosecutor who made the decision to close Sweden’s investigation, said the question of jurisdiction was more complicated than where the crime had been committed.

    Mr. Ljungqvist declined to say more, citing continued confidentiality in the case, which Sweden has the ability to revive, he said, as well as cooperation with German authorities in their investigation into the Nord Stream sabotage.

    “The Swedish armed forces continue to monitor the situation in the Baltic and other areas near Sweden,’’ Mr. Adamsson added on Wednesday, “in close cooperation with our international partners, soon allied, we hope.”

    The crime scene, along the floor of the Baltic Sea, provided little concrete evidence, something the Swedish authorities acknowledged in the early months of the investigation even as they closely guarded their inquiry.


    The original article contains 1,037 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!