I know that it has significant meaning to me but I struggle putting it into words to explain it to other people (especially other dya cis people). So like a few years ago I was thinking about if I may be trans femme. I have since realised that no, actually I was just struggling with it for a while because I don’t relate to the gender roles and expectations society puts on men. I now identify more strongly with being a man than ever before, and I love being a man in a gender-way. I just absolutely hate being a man in a “what role men have in society”-way.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Humans are like computers, we have a biological hardware and a biological software. Gender is the software. Sometimes the software does not reflect the hardware. One (very rough) analogy I give for this is to suppose you have a Mac and someone installed Windows 10 on it. Yes, it’s true that, on the outside, it’s a Mac, but for all intents and purposes, it’s a Windows 10 now. And in the long run, it shall be respected.

    • polysexualstick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah, I don’t subscribe to that analogy because it still implies that there are “male” bodies and “female” bodies when I think every woman’s body is by definition a female body and every man’s body is by definition a male body.

        • polysexualstick@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You said:

          Sometimes the software does not reflect the hardware.

          If gender is the software and the body is the hardware, this is kind of the “born in the wrong body”-stuff many people still use and it implies that there is a kind of hardware/software combination that fits together and a kind of combination that does not.

          • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Or I was implying what the prefix “trans” implies. You can’t be “trans” if there’s no “base”. I wasn’t saying any were “superior”.

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Humans are very much NOT binary when it comes to hardware. Intersex is a lot more common than people think though often in ways that aren’t exactly visible. I know 3 intersex people personally that are all intersex in different ways.

        • Maven (famous)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re right. I reread and you didn’t state the binary aspect. That was an assumption on my end due to previous times I’d heard a similar argument comparing humans and computers on this topic. I apologize for misreading and misunderstanding your point.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Please find a hobby that has nothing to do with computers.

      I just…it bothers me when people insist on describing literally everything as some sort of metaphor to tech. Like…that’s not healthy.