i wouldn’t normally be concerned since any company releasing a VR product with this price tag is obviously going to fail… but it’s apple and somehow through exquisite branding and sleek design they have managed to create something that resonated with “tech reviewers” and rich folk who can afford it.

what’s really concerning is that it’s not marketed as a new VR headset, it’s marketed by apple and these “tech reviewers” as the new iphone, something you take with you everywhere and do your daily tasks in, consume content in etc…

and it’s dystopian. imagine you are watching youtube on this thing and when an ad shows up, you can’t look away, even if you try to they can track your eye movement and just move the window, you can’t mute it, you certainly cannot install adblock on it, you are forced to watch the ad until it satisfies apple or you just give up and take out the headset.

this is why i think all these tech giants (google meta apple etc) were/are interested in the “metaverse”. it holds both your vision and your hearing hostage, you cannot do anything else when using it but to just use the thing. a 100% efficiency attention machine, completely blocking you from the outside world.

i’m not concerned about this iteration as much as people are not hyped about this iteration. just like how people are hyped about the next apple vision, i’m more worried about the next iterations with somewhat lower price tag and better software availability. i hope it flops and i know it probably won’t achieve any sort of mainstream adoption even if it’s deemed a success because it probably can’t get less bulky and look less dorky, but the possibility is still worrying. what are your thoughts?

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Google glass never actually “launched” in any meaningful sense of the word, and was a rough-as-fuck user experience.

      Ironically what did it in was the ability to record video. People were so panicked about being filmed that they started reacting violently to glass users (called glassholes). From that point on it sort of became a laughing stock. Not cool. A tainted product.

      Apple seems to have mitigated the obvious pitfalls, let’s see how it shakes out.

      • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s funny that you don’t know what you don’t know. Google glass definitely launched, and is used by certain businesses. They went B2B instead of B2C and apparently did well enough.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        In terms of privacy in public, the Vision Pro isn’t much different from Google Glass. Both have video recording capabilities, and both displayed some form of indication when recording.

        The only real difference is that the Vision Pro is easier to spot in public due to the bulkier design.

        It will be interesting to see if there will be similar “Glasshole” reaction to the Vision Pro once they are seen in public enough.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not like vision peo aint also recording everything :p
        And if not for the environment travking then for their passthrough and tracking.

        And probably a shitload of telemetry.

  • C4d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    People will rip off the headsets if the ads are too intrusive and annoying. Which is why they’ll either be dead subtle, or they’ll offer you paid ways to avoid them.

    I don’t think there’ll be mass adoption of this either way, mainly because it’s an expensive gadget coming at a time when folks on median incomes are feeling the pinch.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Which is why they’ll either be dead subtle, or they’ll offer you paid ways to avoid them.

      Apple are masters of subtle corporate propaganda. They’ve indoctrinated a generation of people to believe Android is their enemy by making their messages show up in a less readable colour in the messaging app.

      • RichieAdler 🇦🇷@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think that’s mainly in the US, though. For the rest of the world the price tag is too high and the iPhone is the mark of the pretentious or the hipster. Or the iOS developer 😄

        The rest of us are happy with our Android phones.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The blue message shit is just peak Apple bullshit. Signal’s messages are blue to, hopefully they continue to be more popular. Its so much better in every dimension and it actually preserves one’s privacy much better

      • Nix@merv.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No one cares about the color the care about the fact that if the color is green that means sending videos will be garbage quality and they can’t reduce texts over data and can’t FaceTime or get replies in line. Which is fair because androids somehow still use sms and they finally started getting rcs with encryption and now google already started using the data for their ai

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Have you visited a website without an ad blocker recently? Because typical web advertising has become as intrusive and annoying as technically possible, and millions of people willingly accept that.

      VR/AR/Spatial Whatever has the potential to be just as bad, if not far worse.

    • daniyeg@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      i mean it’s easily circumventable, “and now you don’t have to worry about losing progress on your favorite game or losing battery, because when you are not using the headset it goes to sleep mode” or whatever, but you are right if the ads are too annoying people are probably not going to use it, or will they? this is the thing i already think the way ads currently are is very intrusive but there’s a large segment of people who are fine with it. and subtle ads are way worse imagine if they constantly put ads in your peripheral vision. it’s cartoonishly evil which is why it probably won’t happen but even giving that power to them is dangerous.

  • Tolstoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yesterday or a few days ago I’ve read that people already jailbreaked the vision. So if you must have one, you will still be able to tinker with it.

    • DeltaWhy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Someone found a way to crash the kernel, which may or may not lead to an exploit, which would be just the first step in a long process of developing a jailbreak. I wouldn’t get too excited yet. Even if one does get released, Apple can just patch the exploit, and it could easily be years before a new jailbreakable exploit is found.

    • Luvon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I remember this being discussed when Apple first announced it because developers have to hand off graphics to the os so the os can do the divested rendering specifically because Apple didn’t want individual apps to be able to gather data about where users are looking.

  • PunkFlame@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love spaceship games (think Elite: Dangerous and the like), and motorsport games. Anything where you’re set in a cockpit is a perfect candidate for VR. All I wanted was a headset that would act analagous to a dumb monitor - simply provide vision and audio and head tracking (with “simply” being a relative term - the challenges overcome and technology produced to date is, admittedly, amazing).

    But no. What we have are a bunch of privacy-invading face huggers. I shouldn’t need to sign in to anything to use a piece of hardware that should require zero internet access (which is why anything Razer is also on my do not buy list).

    So am I concerned about the Apple Vision Pro? Couldn’t give a shit to be honest. I’m not their customer.

    • max@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Doesn’t valve provide login-free setup and use of SteamVR for the index and the like? Granted, you’ll need a beefy PC for it, and probably some kind of storefront for most games. But at least no Facebook login strapped to your head.

      • thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        It does! It can be played fully offline, doesn’t require an account, and works great with my pirated copy of elite dangerous. The index is the shit! Apple vision pro can’t do shit for me that the index has done for years now.

        • PunkFlame@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          OK @max, @thorbot, I didn’t know about this. I’d written off all VR in protest against corporate overreach. Time to do some more investigation…

          • thorbot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The index is the GOAT, I highly recommend it if you have a powerful gaming PC to run it and are concerned about privacy

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Please let me know if you ever find one. Best I have seen are the ones without head tracking or laggy tracking.

  • ferralcat@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    because it probably can’t get less bulky and look less dorky,

    Airpods are probably one of the ugliest pieces of tech ove seen in the last decade and yet somehow it doesn’t seem to matter. Never overestimate apple’s customer base.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think they’re any uglier than other wireless earbuds. I think it’s kinda cute that they stuck with the iPod earbud look without the wires.

      Not that I have AirPods. I’m a Jabra man myself.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’re pretty much the only company on the planet that can push the “because your friends have one” aspect in their marketing and succeed. Apple users think they’re all part of this exclusive club and really don’t care that they’re straight up being robbed by the cost.

  • 0x2d@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    someone should make a de-facebooked custom rom for the meta quest

    • Chinzon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes please, I use my quest 2 sparingly but would love a to hit it with custom firmware

  • tburkhol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think about the Vision like I think about a new Gucci bag or a new set of Air Jordans. There’s a small, but very visible, community that is super into that product, probably for reasons not related to its actual functionality. The difference is that there’s a lot of overlap between Apple fans and broader technology enthusiast groups, where we’re more isolated from the Gucci and Jordan communities. There are lots of brand-based fan groups who will happily accept branded merch or content, but not interpret that as ‘advertising.’

    The rest of the world tolerates spyware and especially ads if they feel like the product is worth the intrusion. There’s a reason Meta doesn’t have a logo watermark foating in the corner of Quest view field. There’s a reason VR is still very niche, almost entirely limited to gaming.

    Maybe Vision’s AR experience will change that. Maybe viewing your entire life through a video camera with overlaid graphics has real-world value beyond privacy in co-working spaces. I doubt that value is $3000 and think Vision is more like Apple’s Newton than Apple’s iPhone.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s probably more like the Apple II than the Newton or iPhone. It cost $1300 at the time, which is about $6300 today. For early adopters, it was a revolutionary glimpse of the future. It took another 10 years for it to become widespread.

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have some sympathy for the slippery slope argument. Used to be you didn’t need a smart phone, but both my current and last job wanted you to use a two factor authentication app, which required either apple or android. Probably some way around that requirement, but then now you’re the difficult weirdo in the office.

    • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Many password managers like 1Password and Last Pass and KeePass and all the big ones can store MFA details nowadays.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, but if it’s generating a code in real time, and you’re trying to sign into your work laptop, you essentially need to have another computer on hand, right? Or I know back in the day they would give you a little physical device that generates the codes.

  • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think tech reviewers are really naive for thinking that Apple Vision Pro is the future of computing just because it was made by Apple. Nobody wants to use their computer or watch movies in VR, except for in niche situations. My prediction is that users will quickly realize that they don’t actually have any use for the Apple Vision Pro, and the product line will be discontinued.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Let’s bookmark your prediction and come back in 5 years when Apple has used the data they gathered from this headset to make a proper pair of AR glasses. Absolute shit take right along side all the people who said iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch would fail.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think augmented reality will be the future. Once someone gets it, they will dominate the market.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Im not afraid of this or the next few iterations of ADglasses the tech bros put out, im more worried about the encroaching optessive surveillance technology these proof-of-concept devices might represent.