The President has captured over 96% of the vote with most of the ballots in and reported.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think either of them are in the race because they think they’ll get more votes than the sitting president. Williamson is in to push ideology, Phillips is in because Biden is too old and might die.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        They are both there to get delegates and won’t. The only other thing they can do is damage Biden, and that too is a failure.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          If having to run a primary is ‘damaging’ to a candidate, maybe they shouldn’t be in politics. I would argue that Biden sending weapons to a genocidal country is infinitely more damaging to his re-election prospects.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              There’s way more issues I don’t agree with Biden, but currently supplying weapons that are actively used for a genocide without preconditions is pretty bad compared to stuff like student loans or whatever.

              From a purely electoral standpoint, he’s basically lost Michigan because of this.

                • jonne@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’m sure all those Palestinians in Dearborn will forget all about how their family members got exterminated with American bombs come election time. Not to mention, Biden is doing his best to escalate things in the middle east, so I expect things to be worse, not better.

                  And again, he’s losing people all over the place on other issues as well, and there’s the senior moments as well. And of course there’s breaking the election promise that he’d be a one term President.

                  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Many things can happen and Palestinians aren’t the determining voting block for Michigan.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          LOL, what? People run for president for all kinds of reasons despite not having a chance. Did you even know who Marianne Williamson or Andrew Yang were four years ago? Pete Buttigieg went from being a town mayor to the Secretary of Transportation. Is this like, literally your first primary?

          The only damage Biden needs to worry about in this primary is the inevitable passage of time bringing him closer and closer to death.

    • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      dean phillips isn’t dropping out anytime soon. steve schmidt still has hundreds of thousands of dollars to grift off of him still.

      btw the phillips campaign should tell you that all of that waxing moronic on and on steve schmidt did about saving democracy and protecting the country from trump was nothing but posturing for the msnbc liberals. if he actually cared about all of that, he would have told his client dean phillips to pack it up after NOBODY showed up for his coffee and conversation event in new hampshire.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well, yes, but actually no.

      How it works is the states doll out partisan delegates based on primary election outcomes and the person with the most at the end wins assuming it breaches a certain minimum threshold. Unfortunately SC appears to have an uncommon winner takes all approach so even though one of them earned enough to get one of the 55 delegates they were instead awarded to Biden.

      Losing a single state isn’t a nail in anybody’s coffin, so they’re no worse off now than before the DNC primary began, which is to say they’ve never really had much of a chance against the incumbent.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Unfortunately SC appears to have an uncommon winner takes all approach so even though one of them earned enough to get one of the 55 delegates they were instead awarded to Biden.

        Are you sure about that? I don’t remember any Democratic primary states doing winner take all. The allocation is different depending on the party. Republicans have a lot of states that work that way.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m just going by what I saw. 100% / 55 = 1.8% so by that logic one of the runner ups would have a delegate but for some reason it showed Biden had 55.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Delegates aren’t awarded by simple percentage of vote. There are minimum amounts before you receive delegates.