• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s concerning how much support these types of statements get.

      “Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”

      –Dr. Martin Luther King Junior

      • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to re-educate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn.”

        “The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.”

        “First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Councilor or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”.”

        –Dr. Martin Luther King Junior

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          MLK Jr, the guy that has that one quote about white moderates that gets paraded around constantly while 90% of his other words are completely ignored.

          • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Good to see the true feelings of this community reflected in such quick fashion. ‘That one quote’ is a pretty lengthy diatribe, and it’s far from his only time. But the sick comeback makes white moderates feel better about themselves

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          He never stereotyped whites as a distinct singular identity that I can recall, it was always about their relation to maintaining inequality. One of his most impactful actions was convincing white and black unions to strike together, and that the fight for jobs and equality was one poor whites and blacks needed to share. In “The Other America” he constantly references poor white populations who share in the struggle.

          MLK Jr never divided people by race like this, he thought that was one of the Three Evils plaguing American society.

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn."

        - Dr. Martin Luther King Junior

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I very frequently find that very few people here grasp the concept of humor in any measurable way.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      The men who are worried about being hunted for sport have been told too many times that that’s what should happen to them

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      11 months ago

      No no we don’t have to stereotype anyone.

      Let’s just go straight to hunting them for sport

    • galoisghost@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There aren’t a limited amount of rights that can only be handed out to be shared amongst people.

      There are just rights and everyone should be entitled to them.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s impossible since the point was a superficial elevation of their own interests.

      Unless you think the point of feminism (for example) is to make men second class citizens. That’s just not a thing. It’s a rhetoric created by assholes to get ignorant people on board with their continued grossness.

      • H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Unless you think the point of feminism (for example) is to make men second class citizens. That’s just not a thing. It’s a rhetoric created by assholes to get ignorant people on board with their continued grossness.

        I think there may be some radicals who genuinely wish for that, but those don’t represent the entire movement and usually only pay lip service to the cause where it aligns with their personal beliefs. They should be ignored.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think there may be some radicals who genuinely wish for that

          Those aren’t radicals; those are reactionary trolls who falsely claim allegiance to the movement in order to discredit it.

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          For a while it seemed like that minority owned the term “feminism”

        • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not even sure the radicals want that. Anger is an appropriate response to oppression. Vengeance is an extreme form of that but I doubt anyone that isn’t truly damaged would be okay with it.

      • Rooskie91@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s also a psychological phenomenon that occurs in ‘elite classes’ where they think that someone getting more means they get less. They literally cannot fathom someone getting welfare without it affecting them negatively. It’s one of the reasons why poor people still support Republicans.

      • tubaruco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        a lot of women who call themselves feminist believe theyre superior to men instead of equal. most of those are very loud about it, so feminism turns into a term that describes that, even if the “real” meaning isn’t that.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      No shit, the only thing leftists want to pull down are systems of exploitation.

      • Armand1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Meanwhile, the Right want to pull down your trousers to check your “gender”.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        At the same time, privileged people will still sometimes feel a loss of something when you’re portioning out a finite resource. So if a particular group is 25% of the population and they were getting 75% of the pie before and now they’re getting 25% of the pie, that’s a loss. It’s a justified loss, but it’s still a loss.

        That said, there are other things like rights that are not finite in any meaningful sense of the word. When someone is feeling a loss because an oppressed group gained rights, it’s usually because they’re an oppressive asshole.

    • Kachilde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      That IS the point, and rarely do equality or equity initiatives “pull down” anyone.

      But the Haves feel like they’ve earned their position, and that means that if you help a Have Not in any way, you are taking away from their achievement (which in this case is “not being born poor/black/female”)

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The issue is that people generally view their situation not by how much they have, but how much more they have than others. It’s like a race to these people - who’s winning isn’t based on how close to the goal they are, it’s based on how far ahead of the competitors they are. People who have everything they need often see others getting to that same point as competitors catching up, and, seeing that they are not advancing themselves, they feel that they need to prevent that in order to maintain their lead. It’s meant to be everyone working together, but few see it that way, especially among the current “winners.”

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The issue is that people generally view their situation not by how much they have, but how much more they have than others.

        Some people are that way, but not “people generally.”

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I considered putting a “some” in there, but honestly, I feel like it’s sadly the default state, at least in the US. Even fellow politically-left people I meet rarely demand resources for underprivileged people that actually elevate them to their own station. It usually feels like “They deserve more! But still less than me.”

    • Midnitte@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Making sure the rain forest isn’t destroyed doesn’t mean letting the pinebarrens be converted into a strip mall.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s well and good, but bringing everyone up needs to be done in consideration of lasting multigenerational harm from what has come previously, and areas where we as a people and nation continue to marginalize, underserve, and sometimes actively harm some segments of our population.

      Folks who think those things should be ignored are not actually interested in bringing everyone up.

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s funny because extending rights to marginalized people does not by any means diminish the rights of the privileged.

      • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        No doubt that’s appealing to some (one example is the USA civil rights movement in the 1960s, especially with states conforming to federal laws that mandate desegregation of schools) but I think another advantage for the privileged is the lack of competition for good jobs, study places etc… If 50% of your peers are kept in slums then just by biological outcomes (lack of nutrition and sleep) the odds are very much in your favor. Throw in the psychological effects of poverty, mass incarceration, addiction and you have a situation like a running race where half the contestants have a broken leg. Fear of a level playing field might be another factor in why the privileged don’t want equal rights. BUT, imagine if we had 50% more people working on a cure for cancer etc.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      But, but, but…I am winning everything. Can’t let those marginalized communities beat me. I’ve been told everything is a zero sum game! I say in the most whiny, navel voice. The kind of the voice that makes your soul shiver up and die

      For those who you are wondering, the above comment was dripping in sarcasm. Human Rights are not a zero sum game. When marginalized communities prosper, we all better off as a society.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think a lot of equity arguments bug me because they often fail to address the real issue (at least in the workplace). It’s a matter of attitude, rather than parity/proportionality.

    However much we hate it, the majority of people in a stem field will still seek a straight white man out when we look for authority/expertise. That isn’t because they are the greatest expert, or that they hold the highest accessible authority, but because it is an ingrained belief. That’s just wrong, on so very many levels, that I cannot even begin to express how stupid it is.

    Some people have spotted this issue, but their solution is abhorrent - denigrate this group. Raise a generation that looks on this group with contempt, to at least remove the component of authority. It will solve the problem, but it will create a lot more down the line as it becomes the accepted solution. Shall we have a generational genetic lottery forever?

    Oddly enough, I think the “blurring of gender lines” brought about by the trans movement might offer a more meaningful solution to some part of this problem, as it erases the categories themselves, rather than attempting to shift their position.

    • FraidyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Imo blurring genderlines and rendering them useless as a meaningful measure of power is precisely why so many in power now don’t want the gender/trans movement to gain any traction. If people were to realize that gender truly was nothing more than your outward appearance and did not in any way impact someone’s ability to gain power, knowledge, or success then we could end up with a WOMAN in powerful positions or even worse the women could actually start to gain allies with the power to change things when former white cishet male presenting people who still speak with their white cishet friends about all the I justices women face start to get outraged on their friends behalf.

    • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Jokes on them. If I want to peruse the expertise of someone at my workplace, I just look for the Asian dude. The white people would be for gossip or talking about food or complaining about stuff. /S

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I knew Lemmy was a good place, and then the sealab memes came.

    Now it’s better.

  • wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Seeeaaalaaab underneath the water

    God damn that theme song is a banger

    • Trae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sealab and ATHF is what turned me onto mc chris. I was really sad to find out he’s a massive douche bag that got off on kicking random people out of his show for made up reasons…

      The man’s whole rap persona was about being a nerd who was bullied and then once he got the smallest bit of power he uses it to bully people at his shows to demonstrate that he’s not a 4’8 high schooler anymore.

  • gardylou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    ♪If you’re looking for me, You better check under the sea, 'cause that is where you’ll find me, Underneath the sea, lab, Underneath the water, Sealab, at the bottom of the sea.♪

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I know Ellis Henican has a whole ass career that isn’t voice acting, but it kills me we only ever got him as Stormy Waters and nothing else. He’s got such a great voice!

    • heyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Him saying “Marduk, son of Ia, Slayer of Tiamat” inexplicably runs through my head all the time

  • t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    It took me a second to understand “cishet” I’m not used to seeing both terms smudged together and shortened line that

    • phorq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      Español
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I thought it was a misspelling of cishette (a short cisgendered person)… I was excited for a second as a white cishette heterosexual male that my people were finally being singled out in a meme with a cool new nickname… There are DOZENS of us!

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Equal rights are a threat to hegemony. Losing hegemony is scary for the privileged, as it is status quo.

  • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Nobody can give you freedom. Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you’re a man, you take it.” - Malcolm X

    • shuzuko@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Pointing out their whinging is hardly hate. Way to be a perfect example of the post, whether you’re a white dude or not.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        “their” whining. Right, I’m the asshole for not liking language lumping a whole group of people into a bucket.

        If you are ok with demonizing language like that, that’s on you. I want nothing to do with it.

        • shuzuko@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You know, I really, really think you’re reading something into this that isn’t there. What, exactly, strikes you as hate here? What in this meme is “demonizing language”? It’s a joke pointing out that privileged people tend to panic and lash out when the people who have historically had fewer privileges than them start receiving help to level the playing field, as if life is some kind of zero-sum game and others being treated better suddenly means they’ll get treated worse. This is a well-recognized truth that applies broadly across privileged populations and has been remarked upon by many people through the years of building civil liberties for minorities of all stripes, and this meme is just poking a bit of fun at it. No one thinks that literally every single cishet white dude is panicking that they’ll be up against the wall if minorities ask to be treated better. I’m really confused at your apparently visceral reaction against this so-called “hate”.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you are having trouble understanding simply replace cis white male, with any other group like gay black woman. Is it still funny and ok?

            I don’t like to discriminate against races and sexes no matter where it’s coming from. And saying “it’s just a prank, bro” doesn’t make it ok.

            There are plenty of ways to make a joke like this by actually targeting bigots.

            My simple rule is: if it’s something you are born with it’s not ok to lump people together (race, sex, sexual orientation). If it’s something you chose, like political affiliation, etc then it’s all fair game.

            • shuzuko@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              They’re not being made fun of for being white cishet men. They’re being made fun of for being privileged and whinging about other people now receiving the rights to which they felt they alone were entitled. Being privileged is not something you are born with, it is something granted to you by an unjust society. Crying about others being granted rights as if it will affect them negatively is a choice they are making. This is not about them being cishet white dudes. It is about them choosing to resist progress because it might mean they don’t get treated like the super special kiddies our society has always treated them as.

              That you are equating “haha these privileged people are overreacting to minorities no longer having boots on their necks” with “boo hoo, you’re saying all white cishet dudes are bad” tells me all I need to know. I won’t be able to change your mind, so have fun feeling persecuted 💜