You wouldn’t download a chicken tender.

  • @peereboominc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1875 months ago

    It’s probably not advertising that they are afraid that you will block but the trackers. They want to know what user is clicking where, how long you are on each page and what you ordered / not ordered.

        • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Probably like 70/30 KFC/user?

          Yes they want AS MUCH of your money as fast as possible… but we do want to give them money as fast as possible too.

          Disconnect obviously comes at the amount and the margin. They want you to max your credit card on their soda, we want the most satisfying assorted selection with an auto-applied 100% off coupon.

          There’s somewhere in the middle there. They can telemetrize their site into it taking just a few taps for you to buy their higher margin combo meals. Their deals, they can hide as best they can without them being impossible to find for those inclined (price-sensitive buyers who open the app with discounts on their mind).

          After add-to-cart, it’s in their interests to optimize checkout as best they can… well, with a side of last-minute upsells of course.

          Here’s a question: would opt-out first party telemetry be a decent status quo? If you’re not privacy conscious (certainly not enough to pay cash in person), you don’t go to settings to reject trackers… but you still get to benefit from the average user being spied on just a little by internal teams & consultants to improve site/app flows. Don’t think I’m 100% anti-tracker in any case. (I’m definitely medium privacy-conscious as well as price-conscious, so I look for those opt-outs and coupons :) )

    • Cethin
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      Yeah, this warning is pretty clear about that ironically. You aren’t allowed to have secrets, only they are. It’s pretty on the nose, but I guess it could be misunderstood. That’s probably how it got there. The person told to create this wanted to give a warning, but they couldn’t straight up say it.

  • @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1075 months ago

    Are they making money selling food or selling ad spots? Stupid businesses don’t deserve to stay in business.

            • @lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              65 months ago

              I wouldn’t call Vivaldi ‘a good alternative’.
              brave at least has cared about maintaining their source code on github. Vivaldi, on the other hand, just [vomits tar.xz on their website]https://vivaldi.com/source/) and that’s it. they also have made ui closed source.
              they don’t have an opt-out for their data collection.

              I personally use nothing expect librewolf(hardened Firefox fork). but brave is a sane choice for those who are spoiled by chrome.
              the only praise I hear about Vivaldi is their tabs(?).

            • @qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 months ago

              Most of the article talks about the CEO and the company, the only criticisms of the actual product (the browser) is that it’s bloated, which is very subjective because one mans bloat is another mans feature and the affiliate link injection scandal from 4 years ago, which definitely shouldn’t have been done but at least it wasn’t malicious and now is gone.

              To be honest I think people on here dislike brave primarily due to ideological reasons, completely ignoring the fact that 99.9% of people aren’t hackermans™ and don’t want to install gnu icecat or librewolf with 7 different extensions. For those people it’s either chrome/edge or brave, the latter, even if not perfect is a way better option both for them and the internet.

      • @MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 months ago

        Ahem. I was referring to “Adblock” as a class of software, not referring to one specific program (the same way that websites refer to blocking ads as “Adblock”).

        You have made an incorrect assumption.

    • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      205 months ago

      They probably aren’t showing you ads. They are probably inserting trackers to tag you as a person, a purchaser, who likes chicken and is willing to pay for food, for delivery etc. the size of your order may hint at demographics, like family, kids. The address.gives useful data, the type of credit card. What kind of software and hardware loaded the site? Etc etc.

    • Cethin
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      I interpret this as a pretty clear “you aren’t allowed to have secrets” message. The only secrets allowed are theirs, not yours. They’re going to track everything you do.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      That’s optimal performance for “put your phone down and go to the restaurant yourself”, which makes more money for KFC.

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Their “joke” to shoehorn in a statement about their 11 herbs and spices doesn’t even make sense. Like, it’s implying you are using an ad blocker to gain secrets? What?

    The overworked tech dude who had to build this page just didn’t give a single shit I guess.

  • @De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    445 months ago

    Ah, achieving optimal performance by letting them run more scripts and displaying more stuff.

  • @TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    While this is egregious, why are you buying chicken on KFC dot com?

    I didn’t know that was even possible. This is a wholly unexpected mode of behavior.

    • @Duranie
      link
      English
      65 months ago

      An irritating number of companies make it inconvenient to just view a menu, and want you to “Start your order!” to see prices and availability. I get that certain items are regional so entering a zip code makes sense, but if I just want to look at a menu and prices to see if I even want to do business with them I shouldn’t have to create an account.

      That said, for convenience purposes I’ll occasionally order food online or over the phone so it’s ready by the time I’m driving past on my way home and pick it up.

      • @TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I often feel I’m stuck in the 90’s when it comes to ordering food. I like calling a restaurant, I like driving to pick it up myself, I like asking them shit about the menu over the phone.

        I’m a human being, yo talk to me, don’t just tell me to go to the app or the website.

        And before anyone beats me to it, yeah I’m angry at that cloud.

        • @Duranie
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Human? I thought you were an albatross. 🤨

  • kamen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    305 months ago

    Make sure to update your Ad Blocker settings to include the whole site.

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    English
    285 months ago

    Went to some kind of restaurant chain once (red robin I think?) and there were ads as we were eating.

    • @pikmeir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      155 months ago

      Yeah they put ads on that little screen you use to pay. Also it never has any receipt paper loaded.