Many lists put Die Another Day last

  • Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Die Another Day was meh, but I really didn’t care for Skyfall and No Time to Die. The plots were too contingent on inorganic and out of character details. Q wouldn’t be stupid enough to plug a USB drive into an MI6 networked device found on a known hacker supervillain. The convenience of the targeted DNA nanobots just magically being declared to have no solution without anyone doing any testing of theories was unbelievable and just revealed the obvious “we need to kill Bond in this one so come up with a reason for him to die nobly” pitch meeting pitch. It ruined the suspension of disbelief entirely. I feel like they just tried too hard to keep upping the stakes and outdo themselves that it just got ridiculous.

    • purpleprophy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      What killed No Time to Die for me were the nanobots being declared unsolvable in the same movie that explicitly shows EMPs being used. I thought for sure that was a Chekhov’s gun being set up but no, just bad writing.

      • Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        EMP, MRI, or what about anti-nanobots? If you can program nanobots that kill people with particular DNA, couldn’t you program nanobots that target other nanobots? I would assume they hadn’t yet built in a self-defense protocol for the nanobots since they were cutting edge and not assumed to have any countermeasures yet. Anti-nanobots seem just as plausible as DNA targeting nanobots.

  • _ed@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I watched them all up to Spectre and would put View to a Kill at the bottom followed by Quantum of Solace.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, that’s a good shout. VtaK is awful from top to bottom.

      Octopussy and Moonraker are in the mix too.

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I actually watched them all back to back a couple years ago and ranked them as I went. Here’s my complete list, from top to bottom:

    1. Casino Royale
    2. From Russia With Love
    3. Skyfall
    4. Goldfinger
    5. Dr. No
    6. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service
    7. Thunderball
    8. For Your Eyes Only
    9. The Spy Who Loved Me
    10. GoldenEye
    11. The Living Daylights
    12. Tomorrow Never Dies
    13. Spectre
    14. Quantum of Solace
    15. No Time to Die
    16. You Only Live Twice
    17. Octopussy
    18. License to Kill
    19. The World Is Not Enough
    20. Never Say Never Again
    21. Moonraker
    22. Die Another Day
    23. Diamonds Are Forever
    24. A View to a Kill
    25. The Man With the Golden Gun
    26. Live and Let Die
  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Thunderball.

    It is the only Bond film I would call dull. It might just be that underwater fight scene at the end. But it doesn’t work for me.

    Say what you want about Moonraker and Die Another Day. I at least had fun watching them.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    One from each, excluding Lazenby (who happened to make my favorite) and non-canon (Never Say Never Again):

    Connery - Diamonds Are Forever
    Moore - A View To A Kill
    Dalton - License To Kill
    Dalton - Die Another Day
    Craig - (I’m about to commit sacrilege here!) Skyfall

    Overall top worst:
    Diamonds Are Forever - the tone change between On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and this is jarring to the extreme, the fake-hip dialogue stinks to high heaven (“forget it, Charlie! You had your chance and you blew it!”), the mafia types were obsolete, quaint and flat cinematic caricatures, a deficiency amplified exponentially when The Godfather came out just a few months later.
    Bonus negative points for an unfit and disinterested Connery, seemingly in constant self-amused form at how little effort he can get away with onscreen for a then record million-and-change dollar salary.

    BUT…! There is another one, so much worse, but mercifully non-canon: 1967’s spoof Casino Royale, with David Niven, Peter Sellers and Woody Allen. Oh my GOD is that thing unwatchably awful!

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anything with Timothy Dalton. It was like they made James Bond out of wet tagliatelle

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wow, whey I was doing a Bond Marathon many years ago, The ones with Dalton was the ones I most enjoyed. I think it was more action packed than the other ones

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think they were bad movies, and I don’t think Dalton was bad in them.

      They just weren’t Bond. More a before their time Bourne clone. They were a massive tonal shift from the cheesy Moore era and people weren’t ready for it.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        They weren’t cheesy Cinematic Bond. They were realist Book Bond.

        That said, they said the same thing about Daniel Craig in Casino Royale.

        Connery had a bit of Dad-Joke cheese, especially in the later movies. Lazenby had slightly less cheese, but he only got the acting role because he was such a good con-artist/actor. Moore had all the Cheese and all the Camp. A few wheels short of Niven/Austin Powers. Dalton bought it back to the hard gritty roots, with a few jokes to dull the violence. Brosnan was a good balance between Moore and Dalton, primarily action/espionage with a bit of Cheese to appeal to the Moore fans. Craig removed all the cheese and went back to gritty. Almost like Dalton but with honest reality-based action.

        If you like Craig but don’t like Dalton, ask yourself what is more realistic, an Aston Martin rolling without the help of a hydraulic ram or a Mack Truck pulling a “mono” on eight wheels?

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Craig was after The Bourne Identity and it’s many sequels. I think that’s the key difference. Maybe Craig sells the brutality a little better than Dalton. Got more physicality to him. And if you don’t count Quantum of Solace, he also had much better movies.

          Dalton just felt like the Andrew Garfield of Bonds. Let down by the movies not really knowing what they wanted to be, rather than his performance. He’s superb in Hot Fuzz, to the point I now think of him as a local supermarché owner than as James Bond.

        • HerrVorragend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Perfect description why I do not care for Bond movies involving Dalton or Craig.

          To me, they do not incorporate the cheesieness and suave/arrogant amused attitude that made James Bond interesting.

      • raoulraoul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, I beg to differ. Much as I detested the Moore reign, which got sillier and sillier movie after movie, I felt the Dalton Bond films were just plain dull and generic. You say Bourne clone, I say yawn. I will say that it wasn’t Dalton’s fault (I thought he made for a competent Bond) but the scriptwriters’ and cinematographers’ fault.

      • _ed@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I had never watched them until now., the first was more standard bond template but with a serious bond.

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Haven’t quite watched them all yet but from the sizeable sample range that I have seen, A View to Kill would probably be the worst.

    Die Another Day was one of the silliest in more recent years (If you can still call that recent) but the ludicrous plot and stupidity of it didn’t detract from the enjoyment so I don’t think it would deserve to be at the bottom. It wouldn’t have occurred to me from watching it that it would be a popular candidate for worst Bond movie. I also really liked Brosnan as bond and probably because of my age, to me he is the archetypal bond with actors before and after being variations.

    • _ed@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      To me watching them in sequence Die Another Day felt like a callback to the earlier Roger Moore (or even some Connery) Bond Movies. Tonally it was quite a shift from the previous couple of movies.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      say what you will about View to a Kill, but we have to agree that it has the best song. I’ve seen every single movie, more than once, and nothing is as painfully rad and 80s as Duran Duran’s contribution to the series.

  • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t have a full ranking personally, and I there’s some I haven’t seen, but the first thing that popped into my head when reading the question was quantum of solace

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Brosnan ones were some of my least favorites. The Connery Bond films were campy and silly fun, but you didn’t need to take them seriously. The characters and gadgets were the fun parts. But then we get to the Brosnan ones and the FX wrap the needle past silly fun to just ridiculous, like the helicopter chopping its way down the street. I also found the pacing off and the sequences seemed really choppy, so it was just bad storytelling, too. Next least favorites were the Dalton/Moore films, but I quite enjoyed Walken as the villain.

    I’m mixed over the Craig Bond. I really like the refresh; the more serious tone, the more brutal face of these films. This Bond is much more cynical, unhappy, and troubled. Unfortunately the humor isn’t there anymore, and the introspective parts of the character can be helpful as much as they are unnecessary sometimes.