• nekandro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why is this guy not banned? This is literally an oped that asks why China doesn’t care about the Red Sea being open to Chinese ships (and not others)… when public support is entirely on the side of Palestine.

    It would be political suicide for China to intervene on behalf of Israel in any meaningful capacity.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is he really complaining that big evil China isn’t doing their fair share of bombing Yemen? Imagine the outrage in the NYT if China actually started doing drone strikes in random countries.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Rather than acting like the global leader it purports to be, China has made no appreciable move to shoulder the costs or risks of ensuring security in the Red Sea, despite having its sole declared overseas military base in Djibouti, adjacent to the strait.

    The Red Sea crisis distracts the United States from focusing on Asia, buying China time to marshal its capabilities in the western Pacific while presenting itself as a benevolent power that does not meddle in other countries’ affairs.

    Jake Sullivan, President Biden’s national security adviser, was due to meet with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Thailand on Friday and Saturday to discuss the situation, according to U.S. officials.

    The United States must call out China for its duplicity and pressure it to start acting like a responsible power — and in its own self-interest — by sharing some of the burden of protecting trade routes and using its influence on Iran to end the Houthi attacks on shipping.

    A prolonged regional crisis could heighten pressure on the Communist Party at home, where its economy already faces strong headwinds and can ill afford the risks of tangled supply chains and soaring shipping and insurance rates.

    The United States should remind Beijing that its own long-term energy security and supply chains are at stake in the Red Sea and press it to act accordingly, as a constructive player, by, for instance, participating in coordinated crisis diplomacy to help resolve a mess that generates disproportionate risks for China.


    The original article contains 1,133 words, the summary contains 250 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!