• IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    TL;DR company shady

    The main 3 points seem to be: China-owned, predatory loan applications, and spreading themselves across too many concept/trend browser spinoffs. Honestly this is kinda old news and won’t stop anyone I know from using the thing. You can’t just say they’re “probably” harvesting your data for “nefarious” reasons and expect people to all jump to Firefox (as nice as that may be).

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’d add a fourth main point: they have a documented history of creating browsers and then abandoning them, leaving any unaware users without security updates indefinitely

  • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is a great read. Never knew Opera transitioned to an enshittified abomination of crypto spyware and bloatware.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      It used to be great… A truly innovative browser that had so many features that even browsers today don’t have.

      I switched away from it when they switched to the Blink engine, probably around 2012 or so? It’s been all downhill since then.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Same, used Opera religiously back in the day, so much more functional than the rest. Switched to Chrome (yes yes, I know) when it started going downhill.

        Chrome still doesn’t have the ability to set a shortcut for “switch to previous tab”, have to use a plugin for that 🙄

      • w00@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Try Vivaldi, it’s made by former opera Devs from before opera became Chinese

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s good but I don’t want to contribute to the HTML/Webkit/Blink monoculture. We need multiple browser engines in the world. That’s one of the reasons I use Firefox.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    Opera today is essentially totally different to the innovative browser from the 2000s. I miss the old Opera.

    Vivaldi is trying to become its replacement, but I don’t really want to contribute to the KHTML/Blink/Webkit monoculture.

  • Celediel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I quit using Opera when it became just another Chromium fork, and never looked back. It seems like that was an excellent decision, lol.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t like that Opera now has an AI integrated.

    I don’t know that this article is compelling. Their main source of information was discredited in the article.

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I am, perhaps, too judgemental.

        Since Hindenburg directly profits from the company’s decline in stock, it’s not an impartial source of information, but the company’s other reports into companies like Nikola have held up to scrutiny.

        • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I wouldn’t consider them that terribly biased personally; as their livelihood (Money) is put into shorting whatever company is being reported on (Mouth). Literally they put their money where their mouth is…and if they make a horrible mistake in reading a company going under and doing really shady things; they’re going to basically go out themselves pretty quickly and lose a lot of credibility in the process.

          Is it maybe a little scummy? Yes. But as they’re calling out scumbags anyways; it looks more like a legitimate application of “taking a scammer to know a scammer”. It’s better that they’re legitimately profiting from calling out companies that are cheating everyone and reporting on it to benefit the public in the process.

        • corbin@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, Hindenburg isn’t like a team of journalists or anything, but if they cited other sources in their report and it seems to be pretty accurate. If there were big issues then Opera should have been able to point them out, and that didn’t happen.