• hansl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because the people producing code with GPL are completely unrelated to the AI issues.

    You’re asking why you can’t shoot your neighbor if Russians are shooting Ukrainians.

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No, I’m asking why they’re held to a standard the AI makers are not when they’re not even charging for the completely optional tool.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s a strawman. AI makers should definitely respect FOSS licenses.

        You’re just looking for excuses for their shitty behavior.

        • DragonTypeWyvern
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          The entire premise of the AIs are based on stealing intellectual property, which you’ll find cover far more ground than FOSS, but sure, whatever you say, person who definitely knows what a straw man is.

          • hansl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            And you are actually okay with collateral damage just because one of the two party is shitty in a way you don’t like.

            You’re not sticking it to the man by stealing other people’s code. You’re just hurting the little guy who spent hours on it.

            • DragonTypeWyvern
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lul, collateral damage. Something tells me you’ve pirated a thing or two of your own, Concerned Citizen.

              • hansl@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Again you’re not sticking it to the man by stealing from the little guy. WTF do you think you’re justified stealing your friend’s DVDs because Netflix takes money from you? Do you really think you’re making a stand?

                You’re just looking for an excuse to be a shitty person.

                • DragonTypeWyvern
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  If your friend wouldn’t let you copy his DVDs to help artists defend themselves from being outright replaced by a soulless bot with no creativity of its own, they aren’t your friend.

                  • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Noone is being prohibited from using the code, the code can be used if they comply with the license, which they didn’t.

                    Do they make money off the snakeoil from artists? No. But they still make money off the snakeoil, they made quite a bit of it with glaze in the form of research grants etc, likely the same with nightshade. And in the end they just peddle false hope.