Changes to the requirements for donating blood coupled with the pandemic have led to a drop-off in the number of teens and young adults donating blood.

It was a white T-shirt bearing the likeness of Snoopy wearing shades and leaning effortlessly against the iconic American Red Cross logo that prompted a surge in blood donations in the spring of 2023.

“Be cool. Give blood,” the shirt urged. The message — on young people, anyway — was effective. More than 70,000 people under age 35 responded to the call, rolling up their sleeves and giving blood in exchange for the coveted tees.

The need for blood is urgent. Over the holidays, the Red Cross had 7,000 fewer units of blood available than were needed by hospitals, said Dr. Eric Gehrie, the executive medical director of the American Red Cross. The organization speculated it would need about 8,000 additional donations every week in January to ensure that hospitals are fully supplied, he added.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a society that bleeds us for every cent it can get its claws on, why would we be expected to turn around and donate anything?

    We’ve been trained that nothing happens without payment… if you want my blood, make an offer.

  • Evia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s always young people who’re asked to step up. Again and again. Save the environment whilst corporations fuck us; care for the aging population; buy a house and contribute to the economy; fight in proxy wars over a politician’s pride. And now it’s give blood whilst still being charged extortionate medical costs. Why don’t the older generations step up for a change?

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you bother to even read the (very short) article? Basically the whole thing is about how people age 40-65 donate more than half of all blood in the country, and that the significant declines in blood donations has been in the under 30 demographic.

      With less blood donors, blood becomes more expensive and therefore increases medical costs. As the most generous donation demographics continue to age, those that can still qualify to give blood decreases.

      • Zortrox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think they were talking about how older generations need to donate more. My take on the article and their comment was that younger generations are being asked to “step up” and help the country/people, but in return get shafted on life.

        House and food prices doubled over the past 2 years while pay stagnated. Medical bills soar without any signs of universal healthcare being implemented in my lifetime. Student loan debt was temporarily deferred, but now might even need to be reversed with interest. The most the Red Cross can do is say, “We’ll give you a shirt if you donate! And maybe a chance to win Super Bowl tickets!” But in return hospitals can charge $219 for the blood.

        Overall it’s demoralizing. While people should donate because it’s needed, it’s just a symptom of a larger problem of young people (adults participating in society though) being expected to keep giving without having their voice heard.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I hear what you’re saying, but young people like us not donating blood only ends up screwing us later. We’re not hurting “the olds” by not donating blood. The point of the article is that when people donate blood when they’re young, they tend to continue doing it more throughout their lives.

          If you’re looking for personal rewards, it’s a free way to reduce the microplastics in your blood stream, of which young people tend to have more. And it’s just the right thing to do. This seems like a fairly poignant example of misplaced, impotent intergenerational anger.

          Not donating blood isn’t how this gets resolved. But, I do understand how symbolically this feels weird. Nevertheless, as I recall, people under 40 are more likely to suffer injuries involving massive blood loss (guns being the #1 cause of death for people under 18 surely plays into that), and reducing the available blood supply doesn’t seem to get us anywhere.

          • Zortrox@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh, sorry. I’m not saying I think its a conscious decision to screw people over or that people only donate since they get something out of it. I think it’s just one more social responsibility that gets lost under the rest of everything going on.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m hearing it better now and generally agree. Thanks for clarifying. It sucks that it is that way, and it sucks that things being sucky makes good people more sucky. But I’m not blaming, just bummed.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Student loan debt deferment was a joke as it merely shifted the problem down the road.

          The system that charges 70k for a four year degree still exists, maybe we should take care of the gushing artery instead of continually giving unsustainable blood bags to them. No pun intended for the current thread.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is why I “donate” plasma instead. Still helping people, can do it more often, and my first month after a long break gave me $600 in 6 visits

      It’s gonna drop down to maybe $150-250 in the next month but it’ll still be at least $25 for an hour out of my day twice a week.

      Would be nice if there were no monetary system so it weren’t so exploitative but hey, I’ll keep dreaming

  • doingless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Pay me. Well. This is like restaurants paying $9 complaining that nobody wants to work. If I go to the ER and get an aspirin it’s like $3k. But they want my blood for free. How much would it cost if I needed a pint or two of blood in the ER?

    • Hikermick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      They often do offer gift cards. If you were serious about what you said you’d know that

      • doingless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe in some areas. I’ve donated many times and never received anything. I haven’t donated in the last three years though. I’m officially in the pay me camp now. I can’t afford healthcare.

        • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Area and time dependent yes, I’d get them occasionally before red cross spam calling me chased me off.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve donated for decades in multiple states and the closest thing to payment I’ve ever gotten was a $5 off coupon for Bass Pro Shop.

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    The young people also need free medical care and education. No wonder number of donors is dropping. When you are suppose to give something away they plea your goodness of the heart and helping others. When you need transfusions it’s several thousands of dollars thank you.

    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      pay $98 to see my GP to write a therapeutic phlebotomy order so I can then go to Red Cross to have them take my blood and throw it straight in the bin.

      My blood has too much iron so it can’t be donated.

      In my 20s I donated every 8 weeks on the dot. My iron levels were low enough for my blood to be accepted and the regular donations kept them within a healthy range for me and a healthy range for the blood recipient. But now days I can’t seem to maintain low enough levels for 8 weeks to be able to donate.

      The kicker is that I’m still on the mailing lists so I get multiple texts a week asking me to come in and donate.

      After the therapeutic phlebotomy you can’t do a normal blood donation for 8 weeks even if your levels are fine, but my iron is usually already too high by week 6, so at no point do I have the opportunity to donate. I’ve tried getting two TP orders back to back so I can go around the 5 or 6 week mark, but my levels aren’t high enough so I can only get the TP orders every 12 weeks or so anyway.

      Other than iron, my blood is fine, and I’m a rare and in demand blood type too, I wish there was some way they could filter the iron out.

      I’m sick of paying money to have my blood thrown away only to get Texts from Red Cross asking for my blood to be donated.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve donated only couple of years and then decided to give up since hospitals, even with social insurance, sell my blood to other hospitals and are making a bank. I’ll happily donate to whoever needs my silly AB+ type, but giving it to others to sell, I want some of the benefits.

        Am not sure what TP is, but it sucks they would just throw the blood out. Can’t they at least extract plasma out of it or something?

        • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          TP is therapeutic phlebotomy, basically modern day blood letting to treat hemochromatosis.

          They can’t extract the plasma because the equipment that does that is designed to be connected back into the donor’s system to return their red blood cells, and the red blood cells is what I need to get rid of. They dont have any legal way of just, not hooking me back up to get the red cells back.

          But it is silly, because surely you could just hook the “return tubes” up to a bag that then gets thrown out? There just isn’t a policy or procedure that allows it. Or maybe there’s a fundamental problem with the final blood product I don’t understand as a layperson.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s really odd indeed. Then again when I got PRP treatment for my joints they tossed everything away apart from plasma.

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll do it but it will cost you 1,000 a month or 10,500 a year… And I might not go every month…but you still have to pay.

    We live in a subscription based society after all.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weren’t gay men barred entirely? Yeah, I was considered “high risk” by category all those years despite being squeaky clean. Big regrets now, huh.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    I do more than enough for my privilege level. I’m not doing more until my level of freedom is higher than “if someone at work doesn’t like me, I’m kicked out of decent living”.

  • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    Used to donate, would get about 15 calls a day asking me to come donate the next day. Not sure if daily blood donations is sustainable.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly this, my job has called in that donation bus a few times. I always go because its an excuse to not work for an hour and I get a cookie.

      After the first report came in I got some very helpful blood info. After that it got frustrating, as donating blood is very much in support of the public good, but the org that handles it will turn around and sell it (as part of someones hospital bill), then spam you with emails and calls asking for more…

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I donated blood once because I needed to know my blood type and it was the cheapest way to find out. The Red Cross sent harassing phone calls for YEARS after that. It stopped after I told them I just returned from a three week trip to Mali.

  • pohart@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The day my mother passed, she received at least 3 bags of blood. All it brought her was a few unconscious hours. I don’t have the words to describe how overwhelmingly thankful i was that day and still am for those individuals who gave their blood to my mother.

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      And if they charged anyone for that blood, those three people who donated should have been compensated fairly.

      If the blood was free, then no compensation is needed.

      • pohart@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t want people getting money for their blood.

        I don’t want people paying for health care at all but I reject your premise that paying people to donate would help. Times are bad and the last thing we need is sick people donating or people over donating

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not saying we should pay people to donate.

          I’m saying IF the blood is sold/billed/etc to the person receiving it, then the donors should receive financial compensation. The world has jaded people as corporations suck every last cent out of us (usually through subscriptions). Not that this would help drive donations, it would merely make it fairer.

          Look at Henrietta Lacks - there should have been massive financial compensation if anything that came about from her cells was sold. Do you think those companies would turn around and give out whatever they developed for free? Fuck no.

          The world has gone from “let me help you” to “fuck you, pay me”. I’m not saying I agree with it but I anbsolutely understand it.

  • GluWu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t even afford health insurance, I need to keep all my blood inside me.

  • Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m in Canada, but my province also has a shortage of blood donations except… they got rid of the blood donation clinics in a bunch of cities in 2015, including my own, saying they could easily get the province’s needs met in major population centers and there was no need for it? Just bizarre.

  • TammyTobacco@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well as a gay they never wanted my blood before so I’m just going to go ahead and keep it.