Well, instead of symbolically joining a public protest, maybe Scholz could actually act against the rise of the extreme right, you know, like, not letting people alone with inflation and rising cost of living, or not letting our public infrastructure decay after years of neglect. All just because we are afraid of deficit spending and public debt, to the point where the government is unable to do anything anymore
Not copying the rhetoric of the right might be a good start, just saying …
“we finally have to report on a large scale” is the translation. Its fucking bad, but there is a bit of missing context to that quote. Still a disgrace and prove what the german “social democratic party” has come to …
“We finally have to deport on a large scale”
FTFY
but there is a bit of missing context to that quote
In my opinion the most relevant context is that the SPD voted in favor of the new inhumane EU policy of rejecting even fugitive children at EU borders.
Thanks for fixing, indeed my autocorrect kicked w/o me noticing, very sorry for that 😅
As I said, I believe he is a disgrace. I stand by that, also fuck the modern concept of borders…
Still the full sentence was “We finally have to start deporting the people which have no [in a legal sense] right to stay at a large scale”, which is bad enough in it’s own right. Its also fucked that a social democrat even starts to participate in this type of inhumane discourse. BUT I think the Spiegel Cover was a bit misleading in the scope of his sentence, as omitting the last part indirectly extends the scope of the demand onto a much larger general scale. (As in deport all the “non germans” “others” or just implicitly “those” with a connotation of that meaning all the people which face racism today. In Germany that would be understood as refugees from North Africa up to Syria, specifically not the white refugees from Ukraine, Iranian Doctors, IT specialists from Israel etc.) So although I think that Olaf is a disgrace, I think that this cover from Spiegel puts him into one league with Geerd Wilders or Bernd/Björn Höcke. And that is simply not the same league.
Also the number of people Olaf is talking about is around 19.000 People (migrants whose refugee-seeking process is finalized, denied and who actually legally have to leave as they are for example not with children who are allowed stay or falling under other exceptions.) To willingly enter this discourse, letting it shift so far to the right, about such a non issue is wild to me. 19.000 people are nothing at the scale of Germany as a whole nor in the context of the scale of migration to Germany.
And yes the new migration laws of the EU are inhumane, and I do not like that the German government voted in favor in the EU. But to say that this is the most relevant context for such a Cover is not enough for me, as I believe that nuance is important in political discourse if we want to keep that discourse active and not end up in culture war type polarised discussion which in the end is not helping finding together as a society. And this culture war shit is coming to Germany way to fucking fast! (Granted mostly because of CxU, AfD and all the other right-wing shitheads)
Thanks for sharing your differentiated opinion, I appreciate it. Sadly my usually pretty short attention span does not allow me to go into such detail myself, except when a topic triggers me in a certain way causing a flow state, which is most of the time not the case with german domestic politics.
I get that. I have a kind of toxic relation as I am not really able to ignore it but paying attention drives me mad 🫨
Btw, what is your username referring to, Deutsche Amphibolin-Werke or Digital Audio Workstation? ;)
Thank the Supreme Court. Apparently all this, and the impending climate catastrophe are apparently not enough reason to take on some debt.
The Supreme Court didn’t say wr can’t spend more money, they just said the practice of shifting things around arbitrarily within the budget was illegal. So the government can still get the money they need, they just have to justify it correctly and use appropriate legal mechanisms. In fact, the same court also ruled that the government has to do more to fight climate change
The Supreme Court? This a result of the government using the constitution to restrict fiscal policy. They fucked themselves
Was that really the whole government, or just FDP/Lindner?
edit: To the one person who downvotes a genuine and innocent question: **** you too!
All of the current governing parties (plus CDU) are responsible, since they needed a 2/3 majority to pass it. SPD and CDU constituted the government, though. I don’t even know if Lindner was politically active in 2009, he certainly wasn’t influential, so you can’t really blame it on him.
I see. Thank you for your reply.
Raise taxes on the rich.
No, thank the GroKo for this asinine debt ceiling. They were told it would lead to choking necessary investments when they implemented it. Karlsruhe can only decide on the rules as written.
That’s just a wrong narrative. They have raised the minimum wage, 50% don’t have a union contract yet and SPD is to help people on continuing education (who searching for a job), this is nothing the CDU would do. And they have a overweight in the Bundesrat. SPD, FDP and Greens also want a #klimageld. Comes 2025.
And all that in a situation where we support the Ukraine, war in Israel, and with a big dependancy on russian oil which was from Merkel. We’re brainwashed, AfD only lies. CDU is reason for a situation with Bahn, Bundeswehr and infrastructure.
And all that after corona.
No, SPD is better then the normal social media consumer is thinking.
SPD, FDP and Greens also want a #klimageld. Comes 2025.
Well, about that… https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/klimageld-106.html
Weren’t that only 40 cents?
Comes 2025.
No it won’t. They’re saying “we can’t do it before 2025”, that doesn’t mean we’ll get it then. 2025 is an election year, so they’ll use this carrot again in their campaigns. Lindner basically just admitted this.
The FDP is only a stick in the spokes… FDP wants Klimageld? I have not heard a more absurd joke this year, they are the ones obstructing it… Literally in the coalition contract but Lindners departement is making sure that the option is available 2025 earliest und just these days he said, that its not clear if the political will to do it before 2027 is there… Why would the FDP want a Klimageld? Its redistribution in the “wrong” direction
you work for a bank, do you?
none of this has anything to do with people deciding to be nazis.
also, germany literally spent and will spend multiple billions on all sorts of important things. funding stuff with more debt just leaves you less next year, plus it’s gambling on needing less money next year. if you need more next year, you will have to fund paying back debt with more debt or the whole country will default. only banks like this crap
Money doesn’t work the same way for government, banks or people.
For a country to take debt that gets spent inside the same.country usually leads to more spending of people on taxes and a lot of money gets returned.
A state doesn’t work like a person, company or bank.
Removed by mod
As the only way to create money is for the central bank to grant the government a loan, it goes even further. If the government has no debt, nobody has any currency to pay with. It is a surefire way to destroy the entire economy.
Also Germany has been able to take on loans at interest rates well below inflation, or for some years even at negative interest rates. So it has gotten and still gets money in real terms from taking on government debts. You realize, that when you take out a loan for 1 Billion but you only have to pay back 900 Million, you made 100 Million?
If I spend 100€ now to avoid 10000€ in damages later, spending more money NOW will actually leave me with LESS debt in the long run. And we just so happen to be in the midst of a global catastrophe where every Euro not spent as early as possible to prevent it will make it infinitely more expensive for us in the long run.
I didn’t say that people “just decided” to be nazis and I still wouldn’t say that. A major factor is economic inequality (but surely not the only one). The narrative of having to pay back more and more so the budget gets cut more and more is misleading. Debt doesn’t work the same way for governments as for a private entity. Paying back interests is easy if the economy is thriving. You can just pay back the old loans with new ones, this is absolutely no problem and governments have been doing this for ages. Absolute debt numbers in € don’t mean anything, and debt relative to GDP or federal budget also doesn’t say whether the debt can be paid back. We are afraid of possibly/maybe/probably not/whoknows may be in the future and cut spending everywhere. And then we are surprised that people vote for alternative parties
Removed by mod
Where is
WaldoOlaf?Because he’s always forgetting things…
Removed by mod
It would be much better if Scholz et al. would make social policies for people so that right-wingers are not getting (so many) votes at all. “We must start to deport [migrants] on a grande scale,” Mr Scholz told the German weekly Der Spiegel last year, and the German government has been discussing the reduction of Germany’s unemployment money for some time, just to name two examples. Things like that play into the hands of the AfD and other extremist parties imo.
[Edit typo.]
Thousands surprised the Nazi party with an active, judicially recognized Nazi in leading political position is indeed a Nazi party. Who could’ve known that politics is so complex.
Wow if only Scholz would lead the government or something so he could actually do shit instead of paying lip service.
Now, they have to stop thinking that the free market will regulate everything and stop implementing the myth of the individual.
SPD is not dumb. They know if a ban for the AfD will fail, they are having even more fun with lies and wrong narratives.
