• TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        The anti-modding attitude of japanese tech companies is utterly ridiculous. People were literally arrested in Japan for modifying Zelda saves and generating pokémon. People’s lives ruined over some flipped bits of fictional stuff.

        I can only imagine this law was created to protect microtransactions, which if anything would make it worse. All this to defend companies fleecing addicted gacha whales.

  • EK13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m glad this is being brought up. As the article mentions, one of the affected games was the Ghost Trick remaster which received a 5.6GB update with no explanation. It was only through data mining that people realised Denuvo was removed in favour of Enigma.

    The worst part for me is that Enigma lives up to its name and people have been left guessing about where it’s coming from. Some people think it’s Capcom’s in-house DRM while others are linking it to some Russian company with the same name that Capcom may have partnered with.

    As I understand, this DRM has already been cracked so it’s not even stopping people who want to pirate the game. On the other hand, I love Ghost Trick and I wanted to buy gift copies for some friends over Christmas but this move really put me off.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Even if they were switching to a theoretically uncrackable DRM, it’s such a silly waste of time and resources: the cracked version still exists, has still been cracked, and is still being shared.

      And also because there is no such thing as an uncrackable DRM, at most it’ll slow pirates down and at best it won’t cause headaches for the actually paying customers.

      But business has, oddly enough, never been known for making good business decisions, but somehow they keep getting away with it

    • Fat Tony@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well how can we turn a profit if we don’t control every single aspect of the product our consumers have “purchased”.

  • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I guess it’s easier to sit on properties and try to keep profiting off those than it is to make up something new that the kids will like.

    Still a dick move though. Gotta keep making new things.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Copyright should have a 15 year limit.

      Publishing rights must be used or piracy is legitimate.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Copyright in the US started as 14-year duration with an optional extension of more 14 years. Considering how fleeting digital media is, this seems far more reasonable than 120 years as works for hire.

        People may advocate for physical media however much they want, in 120 years most likely it will all have become trash. It’s not a reasonable duration for cultural preservation.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean a lot can happen in 120 years, like that’s an insane amount of time to reason against something for the good of consumers.

          Nintendo published a Mario collection last year and then stopped it’s sale. They failed to provide a medium for those games for a very long time and I think they should not have grounds to argue against people pirating their content given they didn’t make it readily available.

          I don’t even think they should be allowed lock it behind a new console like saying they offer the title on the switch Nintendo online service, it’s not good enough.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is it me, or are all these Japanese companies that are known for making great products now making dick moves?

    • hagelslager@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      In a way Japan is both innovative and conservative when it comes to technology and business. There are still business practices going on there which have been phased out in “the west”. If you look at the Japanese music industry for example it’s both 21st century and stuck in the 1990s for some reason.

      • danque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I had to learn how to use a Fax when working in Japan. Yeah faxing is still a thing there.

          • dankm@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Fax, like POTS has a legitimate purpose. It’s a lot easier to intercept and/or edit an email in transit than a fax.

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Remember abandonware?

    If you put out some scrap jetsam, maybe the high seas would be safer. And a fed crew might even spend loot on new booty. But you’re gonna charge me for 1995… (yes, simplified hyperbole)