The cause was easy enough to identify: Data parsed by Kuhls and her colleagues showed that drivers were speeding more, on highways and on surface streets, and plowing through intersections with an alarming frequency. Conversely, seatbelt use was down, resulting in thousands of injuries to unrestrained drivers and passengers. After a decade of steady decline, intoxicated-driving arrests had rebounded to near historic highs.

… The relationship between car size and injury rates is still being studied, but early research on the American appetite for horizon-blotting machinery points in precisely the direction you’d expect: The bigger the vehicle, the less visibility it affords, and the more destruction it can wreak.

  • Thrawne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I looked into similar data from the NHTSA regarding accidents during lock down on the hypothesis the insurance companies would have an interest in WFH. I was stunned to see accidents did not decrease. Anecdotally i was working in field service during this period, and observed what seemed like less traffic, and yet the data disagreed with my impressions during the time.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure there were less cars on the street but the ones that WERE there were faaaar more likely to be the same kind of karen/kyle that shouts at mask wearers for somehow violating their ‘freedoms’.

      Constantly angry people make terrible driving choices.