• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You’re not a cloud server that needs to run this many concurrent connections (probably)

    • Karna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The test data on article is about server setup which is the right use case for this change.

      Moreover the L3 cache on CPU is what makes significant difference, IMO.

      If that is true, not sure how much improvement consumer-grade desktop will see, given that most consumer-grade CPU will not have that much L3 cache on chip.

      • AlexJD@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        AMD has been putting a lot of L3 cache on their consumer CPUs. The 5800X3D has 96mb of L3 cache.

        • Karna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, that’s true. Only if Intel follows the same in future.

          On a separate note, 5800X3D seems to be most efficient (throughput/watt) consumer grade CPU out there right now.

          • Atemu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            On a separate note, 5800X3D seems to be most efficient (throughput/watt) consumer grade CPU out there right now.

            Pretty sure the 7800x3D surpasses it and the 7950x3D is no slouch either.

        • dai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Man looking at my old 5960x with it’s 20mb of cache from 2014, and Intel’s current top consumer chip with 36mb.

          Crazy to think Intel were ‘ahead of the curve’ so long ago, those x99 chips are still relevant compared to some AM4 chips.