Those seem incompatible to me.

(UBI means Universal Basic Income, giving everyone a basic income, for free)

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    UBI on it’s own is not a problem for me. Where I take issue is when politicians say “we’ll give you cash instead of these social safety net programs”. I think you have to have a mix of UBI and social safety net programs. It’s all about raising the floor of the lowest living conditions we’ll allow and right now, in America at least, we have too many rich people and too many poor people. A UBI of $1000/month doesn’t help a person stuck in an ICU for months at a time and will just discharge to a SNF/LTAC facility.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s basically the Social Security plus Medicare combo like seniors in America get. It’s not great or perfect but even if that’s all you live on you can get by ok. The USA could just lower the ages. I know lowering the Medicare age comes and goes in the conversation about healthcare reform

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Social safety net programs are fine but unless they’re universal they’ll inevitably create benefit cliffs which punish people for making more money. They also cost money to administer. UBI is super cheap and easy to administer: if you’re a citizen you get a check or deposit every month. Simple. You could probably manage the entire operation with less than 1000 people.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The perverse incentive structure of non-universal aid is one of the most fucked up things our society does.