• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        They got a PPP loan.

        but the question is. Did they use the PPP loan like they were supposed to?

        because so many of those PPP loans just ended up being free money for owners/executives and the bottom rung workers who needed it most didnt see a dime.

      • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “No business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country.” -FDR

        If you want to use a quote to make a point about equalitariansm maybe don’t pick one from a guy who threw 200,000 Americans into concentration camps

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      And they don’t get that it’s not the regulations demanding fair wages that are the enemy. It’s low wages and high costs for their potential customers that is killing their business.

      • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also why is their voice so fucking amplified. Like why are we forced to hear their whiny bitching about how they have to pay a marginally better wage to their employees. ABC just went out of their way to find one annoying prick and gave them a platform to spew their procapitalist garbage. And if you have ever eaten at a place like this, the food is the most generic bland shit imaginable. These are the pricks who are complaining, exactly the kinda entitled fuckers you would expect.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep.

      Plenty of places are thriving with higher minimum wage.

      This restaurant crying this hard isnt because they cant afford the wages. Its that owners grew fat on the exploitation, and will now have to slim their excess to pay proper, fair wages.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Employers are unprotected. We have no rights. We don’t get overtime or breaks. The only thing we get is what’s left over after everyone else takes their cut. At some point, the risk outweighs the reward.”

    Right, that’s what Entrepreneurship is. You take the big risks for the potential for big rewards. If you’re not earning enough after paying all the bills, maybe your business model isn’t viable.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      10 months ago

      They sound so entitled. Too bad they’re not profitable enough to hire a PR consultant because his statement was horrible.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If he’s not getting paid enough working for himself, he should go work for someone who pays better and offers all those breaks and overtime.

    • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Imagine being such a dumbass that you can’t figure out how to make your business look superficially good and sell it to some schmuck or load it up with debt and bail. Employers have the game completely rigged in their favor, they just have to know how to play the game. It’s shocking that someone who decided living in Redding was a good idea would be so stupid.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They don’t even take big risks. The company does. If they fund the company themselves rather than get an investment or a loan, they are just bad at the job. If the company fails, then the worst thing that happens to an entrepreneur is that they have to find a real job like the rest of us.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Lol, “we can’t serve lunch to rich people unless someone is payed starvation wages” is not the high ground they think it is.

    You know they’re idiots because someone approved using papyrus for their sign.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    You, in fact, do not have a right to other people’s labor at your preferred price, dipshit.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The statement from them is rich.

    "We, as business owners, do not feel that we are the ones exploiting people. We pay huge taxes, fees, licenses, inspections, Workman’s Comp, insurance, you name it. We do this for the right to work really hard, and to create jobs. Yet…we are being told that WE are the reason why people can’t afford their rent. We are told we should pay everyone more, while we work harder, and for less. Employers are unprotected. We have no rights. We don’t get overtime or breaks. The only thing we get is what’s left over after everyone else takes their cut. At some point, the risk outweighs the reward.

    For us, we cannot accept more liability and expense. We have to pay our rent, too. So we are reducing our costs. Reducing our liability. We are concentrating our efforts on the area that is most successful. Tanya and I, as most other business owners, are tired of hearing how it’s our fault people can’t afford their lives; tired of being told we need to work harder so other people can have more; tired of being told we should be happy with having less, working more, being liable and responsible for everyone and everything, so other people can have a better life."

    Boo-fucking-hoo. Just do it and don’t grandstand about it, nobody fucking cares how hard you think it is to be upper middle class.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    “If you can make $20/hour at Taco Bell, with no experience, how much money do you think I’m going to have to pay a cook, who actually has experience?” Stedman continued. “I have to compete with that. Worse, I have to compete for somebody who has zero cooking experience. None, none at all!”

    OH GOD, WE CAN’T EXPLOIT THE LABOR ANYMORE. WOE IS US. PLEASE GOD SHOW SOME SYMPATHY FOR OUR GREAT BURDEN OF NOT BEING ABLE TO EXPLOIT THE DESPERATE ANYMORE!

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    lolll it’s a fine dining restaurant too. nothing worse than making dozens of meals per hour that each cost far more than you make per hour

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      I bet rent takes a bigger chunk out of their business compared to wages, but you never hear these types complain about their landlord.

      • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In Redding? No chance. Labor is usually about 30% of gross sales, about the same as COGS (ingredients). Recommended rent and associated fees are in the 6-10% range of gross sales. I don’t imagine Redding has sky high rents like an urban center.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    Most other countries pay their servers a decent wage and don’t make them rely on tips to survive and those countries have a shit ton of great restaurants that I’ve eaten at.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “Make that path easier. Make it less expensive, make it more simple, streamline it. Instead of putting roadblocks in front of it, open it up. Guide people,” Che said.

    Moonstone Bistro owners, Che and Tanya Stedman

    When asked whether they felt it was disrespectful to those who work minimum wage jobs to downplay their importance, the Stedmans were direct.

    “Tanya and I are the reason why this business exists, not the opposite,” Che told KRCR’s Sam Chimenti on Wednesday. “If we stopped working, these jobs disappear. Don’t make it sound like we’re terrible because we’re undervaluing people’s work. I think it’s time for us to understand that our work is being undervalued, and that we’re being told that we are terrible people because we are not giving enough.”

    So close.…

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They have no rights to basically enslave people? Is that what they’re bitching about? Businesses who can’t/won’t their employees a living wage shouldn’t exist in the first place. They’re normally those that life can go on without anyway.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Redding is as close to not California as it comes. They can fuck off to Jefferson, or oreida or whatever they want to call it.

    But please send the owner of Mom’s restaurant somewhere more friendly when you do?

  • gataloca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean the difference between them and they employees is that they can sell their restaurant when they want to quit at a good profit while their employees have to leave with only the clothes on their back.