• gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    And? Do you think he heard about it from a police radio, and not literally every news outlet that was covering it at the time?

    • JaymesRS
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You must know that unencrypted police radios have been a upstream source for local media for a long time, right?

      And I’m not arguing that encryption is a good idea, in fact I think a blanket encryption of emergency radio is a bad idea (but nuance on social media is invisible).

      This thread is simply in answer to an earlier poster who asked for a situation where it could be helpful to protect a sensitive situation and I provided one that we have seen analogs of in real life.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, they get some information from radios. They also usually have at least one person at the headquarters at all times. They will know about big events regardless.

        • JaymesRS
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I forgot that police have no filters or power in person to be more private in discussions about sensitive topics just because there’s a person at their precinct. All conversations happen wide open just like you get with a police-band scanner. 🤦🏻‍♂️