• Promethiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes perfect sense if you consider two things:

    1. Consider the reality of ITAR and the value assessment of actually breaking it versus being able to say whatever you want in a post truth society.

    2. The CEO in this particular instance is, to put it charitably, not an example to be held and compared against if seeking a baseline “reasonable person”-esque standards in the self-serving (and self-editing) annals of corporate history.