• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes.

    Also phones made in the US have back doors that the US government can access. It’s not really secret.

    • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s secret like Area 51 is secret. We know it’s there, we know the government is doing something with it, but we don’t know fully what, when, why, or how.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t think the US Govt backdoors phones anymore … mostly because they don’t need to. They find other ways to get the information, like warrantless surveillance of Google and Apple notification servers.

      The other reason I don’t think it happens is that there are just too many security researchers trying to find exploits and backdoors. Also it’s pretty well known that any backdoor can be used against you. The NSA has an interest in domestic phones being secure.

      Granted, international models might have some alterations/backdoors… Even then, that would be egg on the face that they don’t really need if they got caught with a backdoor that applied only to international phones.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why do these threads always circle back to the US? It’s always the obnoxious “USA bad because other country bad”

      And no, I’m not American

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m aware, but if that’s the answer why not include other nations, then? It’s always just the US and I find that very curious and kind of annoying when any criticism is drawn to China on Lemmy. It’s always the same knee-jerk reaction.

          Because from what I see, the degree to which that happens is kind of wide and involves way more countries than just the US and China. Source

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          How is it a loaded question if the answer is a resounding “yes, it’s not a secret”? I think you mean that it’s a narrow question. If the answer is “but look at all these other nations” it would’ve been more than China and the US. By your logic, it’s also quite a loaded answer, then, don’t you think?

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The US is a very different country than any of the 30 other NATO members and often acts in direct conflict with the rest of the Western world. If I did the same and used China to represent the entirety of Asia I’d get chewed out for it, so why is the USA the face of all things people disagree with on this side of the world? Besides, using the US to contrast China creates a false dichotomy and oversimplifies the issue of mass surveillance, obfuscating both the extent and the nuance that people here claim to champion. Stop being so thick.