• NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many Americans are already dealing with the downsides of urban density but without the benefits of a walkable city.

    • bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think of it like getting better public transport. Even if you don’t use it, other people will and that will give you more space

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Houston, during the 60s, you could drive out into the wilderness once you passed 610.

      But with urban sprawl all the way out to Conroe, Katy, and Rosenberg, what used to be a 15 minute drive has turned into hours in the car to escape the edge of the city.

      Every new subdivision pushed the rural neighborhoods farther and farther away.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel the same way, I don’t mind people but in small, small, smaaaaaall doses. But cities like that are great for others, I don’t have to live there.

      • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Y’all might be imagining NYC levels of density and, while that’s important, is definitely several steps further than what’s needed to make America not terrible. Something like rowhouses or even 4-plexes would be an improvement, and that would, at max, only add 50-100 more people to the average city block.

        If you already live in a neighborhood, you would really only be interacting with your neighbors as you do now. It’s not as if your entire city is going to be in the same 15 minute stretch.

        • nifty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’d like that for other people! I don’t think it’s bad if some land is less dense though? I can’t stand living in anything that has connecting walls with another house. People are loud, they don’t respect each others spaces or things, and they get super entitled to using common spaces and not sharing with others. People with children are especially bad at all this. But eh, maybe my experience has just been bad.

          • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, the whole crux of the issue right now is that it’s illegal to build “missing middle” multi-family homes due to zoning in most of the US–it’s almost entirely either single family homes or apartment blocks, two extremes with nothing in between.

            It’s fine if some of the land is less dense, if you don’t like dealing with other people fixing this issue would be a good thing for you too! Imagine if all the people who preferred the option of a house with 2-4 units and its own yard were afforded that option; 100-300% density increases would free up so much of the land that’s mostly chemically treated lawns and unnecessarily wide roads, not to mention even more rural areas farther out. I think it would do a lot to help the housing cost crisis even if nothing else were accomplished alongside it legislatively.

          • brb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            People are loud

            This is a problem with soundproofing. I didn’t know I had neighbors until I saw one guy leave his apartment

            super entitled to using common spaces

            Not sure what spaces you are talking about. The only common space I have is sauna, and that is optional

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The solution to sound is building the walls better with sound proofing. This only happens because houses are built with so many corners cut.

          • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Modern insulation technology has advanced further than you think. An apartment built to a modern standard will have a lot less people loudness than you’re used to. Also, people get louder when the environment is loud, and cars are loud. If you take the cars out of a city, the people get quieter.

        • themelm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Plus you can still just put headphones in and quickly dash home to lock yourself away just like now. And I’m sure you’ll still be able to get people to deliver things to you even if those people are on foot or bike.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a weird way the higher density is actually liberating because it gives you cover for just ignoring everyone. It’s a cognitive trick which takes a bit of practice, but eventually there is a strange solace in urban life.

      I lived in suburbs and a small town for about half my life and those places get smaller the longer you are there. You run into someone you know whenever you go out, and people are always waving or saying hi because they think that’s just being friendly. In the city nobody is going to say hi or wave at 3000 people per day. And nobody get labeled rude or antisocial for it.