• maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    For this hypothesis to be true, it would take all companies and and real estate companies to cooperate.

    Not all, just a lot of them. That is not hard to imagine, since the same companies who are the biggest investors in real estate (commercial or residential for that matter) are also the biggest institutional owners of the stock of public companies. The point is, the ownership of all this converges at Wall Street, and that’s where this goes one way or another.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, because then one company would exploit this. And it would still be a big loss for the companies not owning the real estate.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exploit higher costs and lower productivity paying for office space?

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Some companies continued WFH, some were full remote even before the pandemic. They are shown to be very competitive in their markets. OTOH, many RTO companies have been shown to be hurt b their RTO policies, but leadership didn’t care. Insiders usually point to commercial real estate investments as the reason, where the owners decided they themselves will lose less money if their companies tank a bit, but their other investments don’t take a dive.

        It’s not even a conspiracy at this point. Sure, there are weird middle manager types and people who hate being at home and all that, but the main driving force behind institutional change at megacorps is not Joe the team lead with 6 rungs above him and one below on the corporate ladder.