At least, some of the recent controversies.

  • andrew@radiation.party
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It should have fallen on her manager to handle, and she should have put her foot down on that.

    Other good ways to improve that particular situation could have been separating her identity from the social media accounts, so that it wouldn’t be clear who exactly was managing them. It paints a target on her back as an attack vector (very dangerous due to her lack of experience) and target of harassment. That’s part of why many big brands do not publicize who exactly is managing their social media accounts.

    At the end of the day, management needed to do better and Madison could have pushed back more. It’s just a job, theoretically one she could replace somewhat seamlessly given her capabilities, and the fatal mistake was idealizing it. That probably compounded all of her grievances.

    • 77slevin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It should have fallen on her manager to handle, and she should have put her foot down on that.

      Head of HR is Linus’ wife. Yes, it is that bad. Even telling her manager, would have netted zero result.

    • robotrash@lemmy.robotra.sh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      She should not have needed to push back more nor should anyone need to “push back more” in their job. That’s victim blaming.

      • andrew@radiation.party
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it’s realistic. If a manager at your workplace asks you to do something you don’t like, you say “I don’t want to do it”, and they insist - you push back. Is it toxic and stupid that they did that? Yes. But companies get away with this shit because people don’t push back.

        Speaking up publicly after-the-fact is great too. It raises awareness and helps give a voice to people whose livelihood is tied up in a company they can’t stand to support due to toxic working conditions. It helps raise awareness to C-suite execs that there may be a managerial issue causing it. It’s a good step that some companies take in stride, and actually turn around to improve things. Time will tell if that’s the case here.