• kakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The question to always ask with these articles is: Is this process prohibitively expensive, or does the process output more CO2 overall than you input? It’s always one of the two.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Another greenwashing method.

      The slow boil will continue

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      These articles always avoid answering questions like that and are never detailed enough to inform you. I read this as, without the facts to support it, their process is similarly efficient to others, but yields a more stable end product. If the process scales, it will be more suitable for long term storage than previous attempts

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually they miss the bigger truth. Unless we direct the bulk of the world’s resources by dismantling the current world order, this shit ain’t ever happening, and the climate is going to cripple the world order inevitably.