• CheeseChief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m only apologizing due to the fact I’m engaging with someone who truly believes they are on the correct path and there is no convincing otherwise. I do not need to re-read charts, articles, etc to know that we are headed in the wrong direction.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re “apologizing” without acknowledge I provided you with evidence to counter your claim. Three different links.

      False apology not accepted.

      • CheeseChief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow, why did you delete your original reply? I read it before you changed it to this reply. I agree, you do not have to accept any apology. Good Day.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I deleted it because I did not say what I wanted to say. I also deleted it within seconds of writing it. It’s not my fault you hit refresh that often.

          And I would be happy to accept a sincere apology. You know, one where you actually acknowledge the fact that you pretended I didn’t provide you with any links to counter your claim.

          But I suppose that’s too honest for you, so you’re running away instead.

          • CheeseChief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t really know how I saw it that fast to be honest. Yes, you provided links. I’ve read many of the same. I realized I was only ruffling your feathers and this was going to go nowhere. And instead of continual agitation, I decided its not worth it. I’m not try to argue, I just think there is another way than the path we are on.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, you provided links.

              Weird that it’s taken you this long to acknowledge it even though I’ve pointed out that you haven’t multiple times.

              I’ve read many of the same.

              And yet you did not do anything to support your claim that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. This is because it is not a Ponzi scheme.

              I realized I was only ruffling your feathers

              Ah, so you’re a troll. Noted. Flagging.