It’s a way of denying service without officially denying service. If that sheds any light.

  • cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just heard the term “administrative burden”. But that’s pretty vague.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I actually think that’s not a bad phrase at all depending on the context. I wouldn’t use it if it’s about signing up for a commercial website account unless you’re a consultant, but if you’re talking about signing up for government services, I think it’s perfect.

      Governments know that administrative burdens increase participation costs. Government agencies and administrators that are trying to reduce utilization of a program without going through the burden or optics of changing a law will make every effort to make it harder to get. Imagine if you could sign up for SNAP, welfare, healthcare, and register to vote with one click. I think we’d find program utilization would soar.

      What if someone undeserving takes advantage of the system? Well, that’s why universal programs can be more efficient. There’s no qualifying for a program because it’s universal. Remove tuition from public colleges and universities - you’ve eliminated the administrative burden of navigating aid programs and scholarships and opened up higher education.

      Definitely not the worst phrase.