apparently this is in response to a few threads on Reddit flaming Starfield—in general, it’s been rather interesting to see Bethesda take what i can only describe as a “try to debate Starfield to popularity” approach with the game’s skeptics in the past month or two. not entirely sure it’s a winning strategy, personally.

  • DonnieDarkmode@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I genuinely wonder how much it matters though. From online discussions you’ll see that Baldur’s Gate 3 is beloved by fans and held up as a benchmark for community engagement and listening to player feedback. It won GotY, had a launch far beyond anything the devs expected, and got incredible rave reviews.

    But if you look at the top 20 best-selling games of the year, Starfield is #10 despite a lukewarm reception, numerous issues, and being accessible via Xbox Gamepass, while BG3 isn’t even on the list.

    I think it really brings into perspective just how small a minority the people who post online about these things are, regardless of platform. Maybe the Gamers don’t know jack about your job, or maybe all their criticisms are 100% right. If it sells millions of copies either way, who cares?

    The occasional salty dev, I guess

    • Julian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      The actual developers aren’t seeing any of that money, they’re getting laid off.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I mean, Call of Duty: Another One is one of the best selling games of the year, despite even casuals lambasting it online. I think devs want to feel like they’re making something people want to play though, rather than feeling like they’re shovelling out garbage for the hogs.

      • Radicalized@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah the developers are themselves just workers that don’t profit no matter how well the game sells. Some might incidentally hold some shares in the company they work for but it’s not big money. They aren’t the board and they aren’t the primary shareholders.

        People like being known for having a hand in the Big Game of the Decade. People who worked on Skyrim have that as part of their resume and can point at it and gloat about this crazy thing that is beloved by many.

        Conversely an attack on a game they had a hand in developing feels like an attack on their own capabilities — whether or not that has anything to do with it directly.

        • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve only played a little since the new patch but it seems a bit better but my (very mid) PC still struggles performance-wise.