Flying Squid@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 11 months agoWe live in the future!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up11.73Karrow-down161
arrow-up11.67Karrow-down1imageWe live in the future!lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square242fedilink
minus-squarePatapon Enjoyer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down1·11 months agoPersonally I’m a fan of fake certificate that says you paid money for one of the plagiarism machine’s works
minus-square🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36arrow-down4·11 months agoYou mean the Amazon rain forest destroyer machine?
minus-squarealekwithak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down33·edit-211 months agoHate this argument. No one ever discusses Fiat currency’s environmental impact. *Which includes literally, actually destroying the Amazon rainforest.
minus-squareevanuggetpi@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down2·11 months agoWhataboutism. Bitcoin does not need to be proof of work. It’s horrendously inefficient.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down16·11 months agoBitcoin does need to be proof of work. any system without that isn’t bitcoin.
minus-squareevanuggetpi@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·11 months agoIs Ethereum any less Ethereum since moving to PoS? Of course not.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·11 months agoethereum also has no supply cap. they are different technologies almost entirely. i would not call PoS bitcoin anything except p.o.s. there is still a pow blockchain running for ethereum, and there would be for bitcoin, too, and that is the blockchain i would call bitcoin.
minus-squareAabbcc@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·11 months agoThey talk about it all the time and the impact is much, much less.
minus-squareEmerald@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down7·11 months agoAnd not all crypto is proof of work, some is proof of stake, which actually isn’t too bad environmentally
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down5·11 months agoNahh, NFTs deserve to be their own failure. Cryptobros get two fails for one tech.
minus-squarehavid_dume@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·11 months agoThat’s fair enough, but idk if anyone’s purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·11 months agoThat doesn’t contradict the fact that crypto is fake money
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·11 months agoYou should try reading comprehension, because not only did I NOT say crypto is real money, but I specifically said it’s a failure from the same tech.
minus-squareirmoz@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·11 months agoDude. I didn’t claim you called crypto real money. I’m insinuating you misinterpreted the previous comment. Maybe cool down your projector.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·11 months agoit’s not fake if people accept it.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·11 months agono, because some people accept it
Personally I’m a fan of fake certificate that says you paid money for one of the plagiarism machine’s works
You mean the Amazon rain forest destroyer machine?
Hate this argument. No one ever discusses Fiat currency’s environmental impact.
*Which includes literally, actually destroying the Amazon rainforest.
Whataboutism. Bitcoin does not need to be proof of work. It’s horrendously inefficient.
Bitcoin does need to be proof of work. any system without that isn’t bitcoin.
Is Ethereum any less Ethereum since moving to PoS? Of course not.
ethereum also has no supply cap. they are different technologies almost entirely.
i would not call PoS bitcoin anything except p.o.s.
there is still a pow blockchain running for ethereum, and there would be for bitcoin, too, and that is the blockchain i would call bitcoin.
They talk about it all the time and the impact is much, much less.
And not all crypto is proof of work, some is proof of stake, which actually isn’t too bad environmentally
* fake money
Nahh, NFTs deserve to be their own failure. Cryptobros get two fails for one tech.
That’s fair enough, but idk if anyone’s purchased an nft with anything but crypto.
That doesn’t contradict the fact that crypto is fake money
You should try reading comprehension, because not only did I NOT say crypto is real money, but I specifically said it’s a failure from the same tech.
Dude. I didn’t claim you called crypto real money. I’m insinuating you misinterpreted the previous comment. Maybe cool down your projector.
it’s not fake if people accept it.
So you’re saying it’s fake?
no, because some people accept it
Fair point
Do you mean Schrodinger’s artwork?