Russia has lost a staggering 87 percent of the total number of active-duty ground troops it had prior to launching its invasion of Ukraine and two-thirds of its pre-invasion tanks, a source familiar with a declassified US intelligence assessment provided to Congress told CNN.

Still, despite heavy losses of men and equipment, Russian President Vladimir Putin is determined to push forward as the war approaches its two-year anniversary early next year and US officials are warning that Ukraine remains deeply vulnerable. A highly anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive stagnated through the fall, and US officials believe that Kyiv is unlikely to make any major gains over the coming months.

The assessment, sent to Capitol Hill on Monday, comes as some Republicans have balked at the US providing additional funding for Ukraine and the Biden administration has launched a full-court press to try to get supplemental funding through Congress.

    • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, Ukraine had munitions reserves. Which are, y’know, an expendable resource. And they expended them.

        • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I remember Russia having issues sourcing munitions some time ago, yes. What is your point exactly? That Russia doesn’t have munitions??? They clearly do…

            • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              That sounds like a Kremlin talking point

              Really? Because it seems like Russia would be more incentivized to have westerners believe that Ukraine will be just fine without U.S. aid.

              There’s a reason they’ve been fighting with shovels and rocks since then.

              You know that’s not literally true right? Otherwise Ukrainian casualties would be in the single digits…

              Is it possible you could spell out exactly what you think the U.S. and Ukraine should do? I genuinely cannot tell what point you’re trying to make here.

                • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  You’re starting to sound like a Russian bot…

                  Well, considering that I very much support U.S. aid for Ukraine, I think I would be a pretty bad one.

                  Edit:

                  What about this story that says Russia has lost 87 percent of its troops?

                  That’s not what the article says, silly goose