• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not good of its own merit though, it’s only good compared to something worse. Neither party represents the interests of the average working class individual.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.

      “Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nerco-ing a bit:

          Can you provide me of an example that is objectively good?

          Please don’t describe it, simply provide an example.

      • Anamnesis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think you should state this so definitively in a couple sentences, when philosophers whose job it is to figure this out are still pouring out dissertations on this question.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For practical purposes it has been settled. Maybe there is an objective good, but nobody has agreed on it so all we have is subjectivity.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Okay, let’s go with the word “beneficial” then.

        Edit: I thought about it more after responding and the Democratic party does occasionally implement policies that are beneficial to the American people. It’s just difficult to see that sometimes among all of the pandering to corporate interests. So I concede that occasionally the Dems are beneficial for the working class, and almost/always better than the Republicans.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m making assumptions here, but it sounds like you’re sarcastically pointing out contradiction.

          But there is no contradiction here. “Good” is subjective, and when they subjectively compare the two then one is much better, subjectively