Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThe barbieheimer debate rageslemmy.worldimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down1111
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageThe barbieheimer debate rageslemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square129fedilink
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down5·1 year agoWhere is the incelness in this? Seems like a self roast about not getting girls
minus-squarecro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoPeople in here lack humor to such a degree that they can’t even recognise a joke.
minus-squaretroglodytis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·1 year agoIt’s the combination of self roast about not getting girls and sexism.
minus-squareFushuan [he/him]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoThe sexist remark about Barbie is the set up for the self deprecating joke. It’s not said seriously, it’s there to make you feel a little bit offended and engaged to then realise that they are making fun of themselves.
Where is the incelness in this?
Seems like a self roast about not getting girls
People in here lack humor to such a degree that they can’t even recognise a joke.
It’s the combination of self roast about not getting girls and sexism.
The sexist remark about Barbie is the set up for the self deprecating joke. It’s not said seriously, it’s there to make you feel a little bit offended and engaged to then realise that they are making fun of themselves.