The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel
The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel
deleted by creator
Let’s not commit to hyperbole. Netty is just a manipulative ass who needs Israel distracted with another war
I must have missed the memo where raping women to death, slicing off their tits, and mutilating their vaginas is classified as “resisting oppression”.
Hamas is bad. Very bad.
Edit: I should have included the sauce.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67629181
I missed the proof this happened
I did too, but what we do have proof of, in the form of hours and hours of grisly trauma-inducing footage, is quite bad enough. While we can rightly condemn its overuse, there is no universe in which the Israelis can be blamed for reacting with force.
Sauce: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67629181
this isn’t proof
Fog of war. All information about the war is provisional at this point. The full truth will come out eventually. In the meantime, I can at least believe that the BBC saw what they say they saw. If the footage itself was faked, we will find out at some point.
the bbc saw someone claiming to see something. it’s hearsay.
Yes, that’s true, did you read my comment?
Also, I hate to break it to you, but the vast majority of news is hearsay. Only relatively few things are ever subjected to the level of scrutiny required by western courts of law.
so why spread lies?
Here you go. But be warned, it is hard to read.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67629181
deleted by creator
Yes, I agree with you. It’s a tale as old as time.
There is no genocide of Palestinians. Less than 1% of Palestinians have been killed in this conflict
I’m not totally convinced that this is Israel’s intent—most of what I’ve seen points to a brazen and sociopathic indifference typical of 7th graders and goofy “strongman” populists like Netanyahu alike—but the percentage of the population killed does not factor in determining whether it is genocide.
They’ve killed 0.6% of the population, counting enemy militants.
Gaza is 5x the density of Mosul, in which the US (who quite obviously was not committing genocide) killed ~10,000 civilians.
Things can be shitty and not be genocide.
Again, I really don’t to weigh in on whether or not it is genocide, if only because I’m not gonna change anybody’s opinion here. Alls I’m saying is that the qualifications for genocide do not include the destruction of the entire, or even the majority of, the population.
Any sane look at the situation makes it obvious it is not genocide
And I’m still not trying to argue with you on that. I’m just saying that the numbers you’re citing do not support your case. There are most definitely situations where killing 0.6% of a population would be considered genocide.
Maybe, if they fit any of the other criteria, which Israel obviously does not
Please point to where I said anything explicitly disagreeing with that.
TIL A Jewish professor of Holocaust and genocide studies is insane.