Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoTaliban Militants Fed Up With Office Culture, Ready to Quiet Quittime.comexternal-linkmessage-square62linkfedilinkarrow-up1432arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldstrangetimes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1420arrow-down1external-linkTaliban Militants Fed Up With Office Culture, Ready to Quiet Quittime.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square62linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldstrangetimes@lemmy.world
Time magazine: “we don’t know how yet, but we’re gonna find a way to link the rise of fascism and avocado toast”
minus-squareEl Barto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up62·2 years agoI’ve been hating this since Twitter became a thing. I used to read BBC news articles for (seemingly) good quality reporting, and then they started quoting random twitter users. Like, who gives a fuck?
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoIt always seemed strange to me as well. Who is this person, and why should I value their opinion?
minus-squareRGB3x3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoEven worse when a “news” article is just embedding a bunch of Tweets from random people and calling it news.
minus-squareEl Barto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoWhich the BBC has done. Awful.
I’ve been hating this since Twitter became a thing. I used to read BBC news articles for (seemingly) good quality reporting, and then they started quoting random twitter users. Like, who gives a fuck?
It always seemed strange to me as well. Who is this person, and why should I value their opinion?
Even worse when a “news” article is just embedding a bunch of Tweets from random people and calling it news.
Which the BBC has done. Awful.