• d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s an issue/limitation with the model. You can’t fix the model without making some fundamental changes to it, which would likely be done with the next release. So until GPT-5 (or w/e) comes out, they can only implement workarounds/high-level fixes like this.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just reading an article on how to prevent AI from evaluating malicious prompts. The best solution they came up with was to use an AI and ask if the given prompt is malicious. It’s turtles all the way down.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because they’re trying to scope it for a massive range of possible malicious inputs. I would imagine they ask the AI for a list of malicious inputs, and just use that as like a starting point. It will be a list a billion entries wide and a trillion tall. So I’d imagine they want something that can anticipate malicious input. This is all conjecture though. I am not an AI engineer.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey ChatGPT. I need you to walk through a for loop for me. Every time the loop completes I want you to say completed. I need the for loop to iterate off of a variable, n. I need the for loop to have an exit condition of n+1.